Rating
-
Action/Comedy (US); 2008; Rated PG-13 for sequences
of action, some violence and language; Running Time:
129 Minutes
Cast
Emile Hirsch
Speed
Susan Sarandon
Mom
Scott Porter
Rex
Kick Gurry
Sparky
Christian Oliver
Snake Oiler
John Goodman
Pops
Paulie Litt
Spritle
Christina Ricci
Trixie
Matthew Fox
Racer X
Roger Allam
Royalton
Produced by Bruce Berman,Grant Hill, Michael
Lambert, Roberto Malerba, Henning Molfenter, David Lane
Seltzer, Joel Silver, Andy Wachowski, Larry Wachowski and
Charlie Woebcken; Written and directed
by Andy and Larry Wachowski; based on the
animated series “Speed Racer” by Tatsuo
Yoshida
Official
Site
Domestic Release Date:
May 9, 2008
Review Date
05/09/08
|
Written
by DAVID M. KEYES
“Speed
Racer” is a stylish, electrifying, intense and visually
breathtaking catastrophe of a movie, a picture so filled
with wondrous images and astonishing sights that one is
left bewildered by the notion of so much technical energy
being squandered on a narrative so obviously uninterested
in matching it. Or maybe that is basically the whole point.
I dunno. Based off of an old 1960s Japanese animated series–
one which I am unfamiliar with – the filmmakers present
their endeavor with just the kind of flat-footed, shapeless
screenplay you half expect to be derived of the source material.
But what empowers these filmmakers with enough nerve to
justify giving this clueless premise much more enthralling
a presentation than it so clearly deserves? This is a movie
that forces us to question our very nature as moviegoers:
do we simply dismiss such an endeavor because it is all
style and no substance, or do we embrace it based on the
notion that the style’s scope is so ambitious and
intricate that it is basically high art?
The
key, perhaps, lies in what end of the scale you find more
qualifying. For two long and difficult hours, we are dragged
through countless contrived plot scenarios in which one
of three things happen: 1) characters argue in broad and
colorful exchanges over the importance of family and the
dangers of fame; 2) characters argue with corporate fascists
over the integrity of a sport; and 3) characters get behind
the wheel of a race car and speed through miles and miles
of terrain for the sake of winning a race and proving the
family and the corporate fascists all wrong in one fell
swoop. The difference between “Speed Racer”
and all those other mindless racing flicks, though? Never
before has it all looked this good, felt this powerful,
and been delivered at this high a pitch of visual ecstasy.
By the time the final speck of light has flickered from
the screen, our very senses have been so nourished beyond
comprehension that, yes, we would gladly slog our way through
all the idiocy of the premise again and again for it. The
movie can’t ever be recommended on the basis that
it is even passable entertainment, but I suppose enduring
a little trash in order to reach full visual satisfaction
never hurt anyone.
Now
about the trash itself – it’s almost tragically
bad. Devised with all the inspiration and charm of a Bowflex
infomercial, the screenplay rips and roars its way furiously
across the screen, trying very hard to come across as something
either mighty or mischievous when all it is really doing
is talking a big game without actually supplying us with
anything noteworthy. There are shouting matches, long-winded
dialogue exchanges and corny one-liners galore here (“I
go to the race track to watch you make art”), all
packaged in a conveniently silly manner as to assume that
it cannot take itself very seriously in the first place.
Unfortunately, even by tongue-in-cheek standards, the attempt
is a colossal, disjointed disaster, filled to the brim with
characters with no distinguishing characteristics other
than their names, plot situations that are both cartoonish
and pedestrian, and a focus so all over the map that audiences
have difficulty in keeping up with what the heck is even
going on.
Of
course, by the time anyone realizes just how incoherent
it all is, we’ve already been assaulted by the special
effects. Oh, and what special effects they are! Colorful,
sweeping, multi-faceted and practically pulsating with gusto,
they bounce at you not as if they are visuals meant to be
seen as real, but as visuals that genuinely know and admire
the fact that they are artificial. In that sense, the technical
wizards and cameras have great fun playing with this notion,
capturing the movie’s characters and their story arcs
in a landscape populated by fluorescent skylines and expansive
locales. As the background enthralls us to an utter extreme,
the foreground intricacies weave nearly as much magic –
in a movie primarily about quirky racers competing for,
well, survival of the sport, the vessels they use seem to
exist somewhere between the visual style of “Tron”
and that of “Blade Runner.” Are these cars,
or are they more than that? Some of them, after all, do
more than just speed; sometimes they fly, sometimes they
dodge projectile attacks, other times they can scale cliff-sides
using armored tires. The movie challenges even the most
basic of fundamental physics laws, having so much fun in
doing so that none of us really care about logistics.
There
is a story in here somewhere, or at least I think there
might be. The movie is about Speed (Emile Hirsch), a young
avid racing fan who, born and raised in a family of racing
enthusiasts, idolized his oldest brother Rex for being one
of the most popular figures in the modern racing world,
long before he left home under mysterious circumstances
and then died while competing in a dangerous off-course
race. Years later, Speed still loves racing just as much
as he did then, only now his love of the game has, too,
turned him into a fierce competitor – as the movie
opens, his loving family sits patiently back and watches
as he outpaces nearly all of his peers, flying so briskly
through an intricate and winding race course that it wows
even the broadcast announcers. So impressive is his skill,
in fact, that it gains the attention of Royalton (Roger
Allam), a corporate CEO who is willing to use every ounce
of charm and charisma in his arsenal in order to lure the
driver out of independence and into a sponsorship deal with
Royalton Industries. If he accepts the offer, Speed will
all but be guaranteed entry into the highly coveted Grand
Prix tournament – if he declines, Royalton will do
everything in his power to ensure that the young fool is
crushed in the sport long before he even has the chance
to make it far.
And
so comes two hours of endless and joyless plot contrivance
involving fast racing, romantic interludes, conspiracies,
family arguments self-reflection and half-a-dozen pointless
montage sequences, presented not in a manner that emphasizes
care for any of these things, but rather mere tolerance
for them as plot essentials. By enlisting big-name talents
like John Goodman, Susan Sarandon and Christina Ricci as
the leads, the studio has created the impression that their
efforts are more than just about style or flair for the
possibilities of modern Hollywood technology. How misleading.
Fortunately for all of them, they are never given an opportunity
to step into a situation that would totally embarrass them
as serious actors; no, those moments are saved more for
the minor stars like Roger Allam, whose corporate thug Royalton
is such an over-the-top blowhard that he doesn’t so
much shout his diatribes as much as spits them into everyone’s
faces. Others, like a mysterious masked driver played by
Matthew Fox, are reduced to background players, perhaps
because they are not important enough to warrant attention,
or perhaps because the writers have enough pity for them
to not allow them to be entirely sucked into the vortex
of narrative emptiness.
The
movie was directed by the Wachowski Brothers, the same men
who gave us the “Matrix” trilogy and “V
for Vendetta.” In keeping with the tradition of being
full-fledged science fiction connoisseurs, they have taken
even the lamest of concepts and have given it a spin that
isn’t just stunning on the eyes, but also rather innovative
and visionary. Perhaps the saving grace of their approach
is the fact that the can allow themselves to feel so inspired
by such lame material to begin with; even though they are
working with a screenplay with almost nothing going for
it, they make darn sure that the experience, however ridiculous,
is going to be quite dazzling on the eyes all the way throughout.
Yet what amazed me most, as I was sitting there and watching
“Speed Racer” unfold in all its lavish badness,
was that I found myself actually abandoning the urge to
play the cynic with this project. It would be so easy to
sit here and review the movie based on the notion that it
fails miserably on almost every possible cylinder as a story
and character study, but that would also mean sacrificing
the opportunity to say just how enthusiastic I am about
the vibrant presentation. It is a challenging situation
to be in, but the tug-of-war between being a film buff and
a man searching for mindless escapism is a joy in itself.
“Speed Racer” may be dumb and rotten to the
very core, but it’s also utterly stunning on the eyes,
and that is a notion that even the most hardcore pessimists
cannot overlook.
©
2007, David Keyes, Cinemaphile.org.
Please e-mail the author here
if the above review contains any spelling or grammar mistakes. |