Rating
-
Cast & Crew info:
Action/Adventure (US); 2007; Rated PG-13
for intense sequences of action/adventure violence and some
frightening images; Running Time: 168 Minutes
Cast
Johnny Depp
Jack Sparrow
Geoffrey Rush
Barbossa
Orlando Bloom
Will Turner
Keira Knightley
Elizabeth Swann
Jack Davenport
Norrington
Bill Nighy
Davy Jones
Jonathan Pryce
Governor Weatherby Swann
Tom Hollander
Lord Cutler Beckett
Produced by Jerry Bruckheimer, Bruce Hendricks,
Peter Kohn, Eric McLeod, Chad Oman, Pat Sandston, Mike Stenson;
Directed by Gore Verbinski; Written
by Ted Elliott and Terry Rossio
Official
Site
Domestic Release Date:
May 25, 2007
Review Date
07/01/07
|
Written
by DAVID M. KEYES
There
is a scene early on in “Pirates of the Caribbean:
At World’s End” when Captain Jack Sparrow (Johnny
Depp) finds himself barking orders at a crew of insubordinate
misfits that, for the lack of a better description, are
also exact physical replicas of himself. The scene appears
as such because Sparrow is the most recent arrival of that
elusive but immense vacuum of space best known as Davy Jones’
Locker – the world that exists beyond the borders
of our own – and its emptiness becomes a podium for
his eccentric persona to absolve itself of lunacy and reasoning,
the only two things that he was still proficient at on this
side of the map. Because he is the isolated subject of this
multi-faceted sequence in which one Sparrow argues with
hundreds of others, we half-expect Depp to be liberated
enough to be able to leap at the material with zeal and
spirit. But the enthusiasm never emerges from his work;
nor, for that matter, does anything resembling general interest
or patience. It is a sad and potentially alarming warning
sign for any movie when its most stimulating screen talent
begins to show signs of being bored with the material, but
it is even more startling when it happens to a franchise
as elaborate as this, especially so late into the story
arc and with such a distinctive and memorable character
at the forefront.
Leaping
off the screen like it has no inclination to make any effort
other than what is required of it of a passing grade, “At
World’s End” is a sweepingly ambitious movie
that, alas, takes too long a time making its point, and
far less effort actually doing something meaty with the
opportunities given to it. The picture is the third in an
ongoing series of flicks helmed by director Gore Verbinski,
whose first outing in this franchise, “The Curse of
the Black Pearl,” was so monumental a sleeper hit
for Walt Disney Studios in 2003 that follow-ups were a given
right from the start. At least, to some extent, the director
knew he was getting into; his follow-up, “Dead Man’s
Chest” from last summer, was not only more amusing
and enthusiastic than its predecessor, but also more concise,
more dedicated to the premise, and more aerodynamic when
it came to stable characterizations and well-paced storytelling.
His knack for streamlining what worked so well with the
first film into a more exciting follow-up is an advantage
not too unlike what the Wachowski brothers did for their
“Matrix” franchise, but where both of them fail
lies in their tendency to over-reach. In both instances,
the second and third chapters of each sage were filmed back-to-back,
a scheme initially lauded for its quick turnaround on multiple
projects, but a scheme nonetheless that burdens writers
who are essentially dividing one narrative into two halves
without making them seem fragmented or disjointed in the
process. Ted Elliot and Terry Rossio, needless to say, have
not learned from the mistakes of the “Matrix”
boys; whereas the second movie was filled to the brim with
exciting sub-plots and internal conflicts that built great
promise with each passing action, this third chapter spends
way too much time tying up loose ends and resolving early
conflicts for it to be regarded as an isolated product.
Even when it wants to try something new with the premise,
the film feels as if it’s doing so just for the sake
of creating distinction between it and the previous endeavor,
however half-hearted it may be.
At
the end of its predecessor, the fate of pirates became something
of a tug-of-war, as the sinister and determined Lord Cutler
Beckett (Tom Hollander), leader of an East India trading
company, assumed control of the much sought after heart
of Davy Jones, and the swashbucklers’ most notorious
shield, Jack Sparrow, was taken out of this world and into
another by a sea creature best known as the “Kracken.”
As this one opens, newly-revived pirate villain-turned-asset
Barbossa (Geoffrey Rush) assumes direction of the Black
Pearl and its crew, who have resolved to set off and recover
its original owner from beyond the shores at World’s
End. Why? Certainly not because anyone on board actually
misses Sparrow or found him irresistible, mind you; in truth,
his existence in this world becomes a necessity when it
is revealed that the nine pirate lords (one of them being
him) must gather in order to release the spirit of Calypso,
goddess of the seas, back to the ocean. Such is an action
seen by Barbossa as the only logical opposition to Davy
Jones and the growing threat he maintains against pirates;
Jones is not only a feared creature among pirates now, but
also an assassin, and under the authority of the ruthless
Beckett he may also very well be single-handedly responsible
for the imminent extinction of all things swashbuckler-related.
That
this would also spell out the end of a franchise for a studio
way too eager to let their most popular movie series end
at a third chapter makes most of what goes on in “At
World’s End” all the more transparent. The movie
is agonizingly obvious, sometimes cluttered beyond belief
with the way it likes to plant all these new seeds of possibility
in the narrative fabric, and rather tedious in how it resolves
certain solutions with little more than brief observations
or mere mentions in dialogue. Consider a scene in which
the Keira Knightley character makes the realization that
her father has passed on into the netherworld; the sequence
is great in the way it plays off-beat with the approach
to direct tragedy, but the prospect of it being anything
more than an additive is excelled by the movie’s arrogant
hidden agenda. Here, things that happen in the margins are
just fill-in for the bigger conflict, which is just as much
about saving pirates from their biggest challenge as it
is about creating a wide-open scenario that allows them
to be stars of one, if not several, more sequels. Nothing
is more supercilious than a movie with that amount of self-importance.
The
actors plod their way through the material like they are
waiting for paychecks. Orlando Bloom, whose slight improvement
as an actor in the past four years does little in the way
of shielding him from us detecting his obvious boredom,
is reduced to mere crutch status by the screenplay here,
while his would-be-bride, played by Keira Knightley, handles
the struggle of an attraction against that of a true love
like it is even less interesting than the story makes it
out to be; when William asks her to marry him during a sword-fight
towards the end, we half expect her to tell him she’s
too apathetic to say yes or no. Of all the talented thespians
that populate the celluloid, only Geoffrey Rush seems to
be having any fun. His Barbossa, the antagonist of the first
film who is brought back to life to resolve two important
narrative dilemmas, is a quirky and coarse person who engages
in parley that is often over-the-top in its wittiness, and
whose persona takes full advantage of the off-beat and wacky
mannerisms that are of standard to this material. Watching
him eases a lot of the frustration felt from seeing his
co-stars underperforming, and I would gladly sit through
a handful of additional “Pirates” films just
for the sake of seeing Rush upstage everyone he is surrounded
by again.
The
climax, at least, is rousing. On the brink of their darkest
hour, our heroes and their team players aboard the Black
Pearl perform a challenging face-off with the villains of
the Flying Dutchman within a whirlpool, an act that allows
both frontal and background conflicts to overlap onto one
another and create a multi-faceted beast of a peak. Some
of those 20 minutes are the most exhilarating you will experience
in this franchise, and their excitement is interspersed
with confrontations, dialogue, personal realizations and
last-minute decisions that test the characters in monumental
ways. At the end, immediate reflection tells us that these
positives are noteworthy enough to balance out several of
the negatives, but even by those estimations, the movie
cannot ignore its gravest mistakes. The end result is neither
bad nor impassable by any stretch, but the strikes against
it leave us rather weary about wanting to go any farther
on the voyage. Pirates may be tireless in their ongoing
quests for booty, but after enduring this last one, a few
of us might be eager to stay off the open seas for a while.
© 2007, David Keyes, Cinemaphile.org.
Please e-mail the author here
if the above review contains any spelling or grammar mistakes. |