Rating
-
Cast & Crew
info:
Michael Keaton
Jonathan Rivers
Chandra West
Anna Rivers
Deborah Kara Unger
Sarah Tate
Ian McNeice
Raymond Price
Sarah Strange
Jane
Nicholas Elia
Mike Rivers
Mike Dopud
Detective Smits
Produced by Paul Brooks, Simon Brooks, Stephen Hegyes,
Scott Niemeyer, Jonathan Shore and Shawn Williamson; Directed
by Geoffrey Sax; Written by Niall Johnson
Thriller (US); 2005;
Rated PG-13 for violence, disturbing images and language;
Running Time: 101 Minutes
Official
Site
Domestic Release Date:
January 7, 2005
Review Date
01/07/05 |
Written
by DAVID KEYES He
or she who is able to emerge from "White Noise"
with a full perspective on the plot should be regarded as
a miracle worker. Here I am, a movie critic writing a review
for a movie that I observed with the utmost attention for
a full 100 minutes, and I can't even bring myself to come
up with the words to describe it - other than saying it
wants to be both scary and stimulating. Of course, being
an endeavor that lacks any kind of solid framework, it fails
miserably on both counts. There is certainly very little
doubt that someone, somewhere, high up in the Universal
Pictures chain of command saw a promising result from this
sort of premise
but what in the world are the filmmakers
trying to say with it here? How do they expect their movie
to amuse or engage viewers in the slightest if it doesn't
take the time to offer necessary insights into enigmatic
clues and puzzles?
The movie, at
least, is spot on in one regard: it respects the long-running
tradition of January cinema releases by being both lousy
and miscalculated. Guided by a screenplay that seems like
it was written in nothing but broad strokes, it sleepwalks
from one dreary segment to the next, occasionally breaking
for some visual jolts, and only volunteers useful information
in very small doses. Furthermore, there is never a moment
during the picture that suggests we are ever heading towards
a full reveal of the story arc; rather, it plays like some
sort of bound-and-gagged kidnapping victim who falls to
the floor in defeat instead of trying to remove the restraints
so we can hear what it has to say. Horror films (especially
those recent ones in the vein of "The Ring") are
obliged to be forward with their narratives because moviegoers
require details in order to fully realize (and appreciate)
the payoff. This movie does none of that, and by the end,
we aren't really intrigued by the resolution as much as
we are bored with the whole concept.
The film stars
Michael Keaton as Jonathan Rivers, an architect whose wife,
a famous writer named Anna Rivers (Chandra West), mysteriously
goes missing after her car is found abandoned off the side
of a local river channel. The authorities suspect she has
drowned in the waters, but Jonathan refuses to buy into
that possibility unless a body is found. He stares off into
space, makes pleas and offers hope via press conferences,
and sits quietly in his living room watching home movies
as he waits for new information to come in regarding her
disappearance. Days later, unfortunately, she turns up just
as they expect her, and suddenly the man's once-happy life,
recently enhanced by news that his lovely bride might be
pregnant with his child, comes crashing down.
But his grief is quickly sidelined by new and strange occurrences
that are beginning to happen in his home. His phone's caller
ID picks up incoming calls from Anna's now-inactive cell
phone. He hears strange things between static when he answers
it. And seemingly out of the blue, he crosses the path of
a man named Raymond Price (Ian McNeice), who insists that
Jon's deceased wife is trying to contact him from the other
side. Though the notion is bizarre and infuriates the grieving
widow on first suggestion, it is nonetheless something he
doesn't want to completely ignore, either, and after these
odd little occurrences continue, he pays a visit to this
Price character looking for answers.
The
script comes up with quite an odd setup for its supernatural
undertone. Price, we are told, is being contacted by the
dead via what is referred to as E.V.P., short for "electronic
voice phenomena," in which basic devices like a computer
system and voice-recording software can instigate conversations
with those who have passed on into another realm (I guess).
Many of those spirits that initiate contact with the living
are those who have an important message to deliver to a
loved one, we gather - but on occasion, a hostile spirit
gets through the communication lines and decides it wants
to stir up trouble for the living. Unfortunately for Jonathan,
messages that may be coming from his wife also seem to involve
those same kinds of hostile spirits; often, her voice and
image are washed out by a series of shadowy figures that
shout obscenities back at him from the other side. The only
question is, are these angry spirits in any way related
to what Anna herself is trying to say to him through the
E.V.P.? And if so, what does it all mean to him?
Aside from a
half-hearted and immensely under-nourished premise, the
movie suffers from the notion that none of its other aspects
- actors, visual effects, etc. - have much going for them,
either. Michael Keaton, who is an admirable star in even
the most insufferable material, falls flat in this role
as a grieving widow here because his persona is emotionally
despondent through most of the plot situations (not the
least of which is his wife's untimely death). The visuals,
meanwhile, lack spark; director Geoffrey Sax approaches
subjects and settings without any sense of distinction,
and his camera moves around as if it is unsure of what the
most important element is of a specific angle. And what
of that howling climax? Good question. The film sends us
barreling through a synthetic series of shocks, revelations
and twists for a good 90 minutes or so, but then coughs
up a conclusion that is so flimsy and unanticipated that
it creates new uncertainty instead of resolving older issues.
If there is indeed
a satisfactory explanation to all of the logic that "White
Noise" throws at us, I'm all ears. But as it stands,
this is not the kind of product you should be going to if
you are looking to be productive while studying narrative
details. Those who bother trying here will no doubt exit
the theaters pulling their hair out.
© 2005, David Keyes, Cinemaphile.org.
Please e-mail the author here
if the above review contains any spelling or grammar mistakes. |