Rating
-
Cast & Crew info:
Viggo Mortensen
Frank Hopkins
Zuleikha Robinson
Jazira
Omar Sharif
Sheikh Riyadh
Louise Lombard
Lady Anne Davenport
Adam Alexi-Malle
Aziz
Saïd Taghmaoui
Prince Bin Al Reeh
Produced by Patricia
Carr, Chris Salvaterra, Casey Silver and Don Zepfel; Directed
by Joe Johnston; Written by John Fusco
Drama/Action (US); 2004; Rated PG-13 for adventure
violence and some mile innuendo; Running Time: 136
Minutes
Official
Site
Domestic Release Date:
March 5, 2004
Review Date:
3/08/04 |
Written
by DAVID KEYES
Joe
Johnston's "Hidalgo" is an ambitious horse-racing
vehicle in which the horse emerges as the most interesting
character in the story. This announcement should not create
the impression, though, that we're dealing with a creature
that is either very likable or charismatic; rather, it's
just that he's surrounded by human characters that in most
other movies would likely be disposed of in the first 15
minutes. Starring Viggo Mortensen (of "Lord of the
Rings" fame) as real-life cowboy Frank Hopkins, the
movie is about the relationship between a man and steed
as they travel halfway across the world to compete in a
death-defying race on the barren soils of the Arabian desert.
Hopkins, of course, is there only partially for the reward
moneyin essence, the journey is a chance for him to
discover himself and realize his personal destiny. In other
words, standard stuff.
The
movie takes a road that is all-too familiar these days when
it comes to conflicted heroes in major competitions; it
is essentially "Seabiscuit" minus the cheering
crowds. Even then, it might have worked had any of its messages
about perseverance or dedication came across as genuine,
but they never do. Most films about competitions at least
utilize all the necessary elements to underscore the personal
dilemmas; "Hidalgo" simply plods through the material
without offering much in the way of insight on any of its
issues, and the result is a film that is generally uninteresting
on several cylinders.
Contrary
to what most viewers would expect upon hearing the main
character's name, Mortensen's Frank Hopkins does not actually
come off as an exact representation of the historical figure;
in fact, there is the distinct impression here that his
role is nothing more than a diluted version of the real
person, embellished with all sorts of obligatory character
clichés (such as the one that insists all men in
the old west spoke in nothing but colorful metaphors). A
chord of reality, at least, is instituted in the early story
setupas the movie opens on a cold winter morning,
Frank looks into the eyes of his horse, smiles assuredly,
and ushers him full-speed down into an open valley. Here,
they appear to be clear victors in a race that was probably
in favor of more prominent competitors; as they pass a baffled
opponent just short of the finish line, there is the sense
that none of it was ever supposed to happen, as if Hidalgo
is the kind of horse that wins competitions simply by getting
lucky. The irony, of course, is that he didn't just win
an occasional race across long stretches of land; historically,
in fact, he won almost all of the competitions he was ever
involved in.
Meanwhile,
Hidalgo's emotionally torn tamer Frank is facing new challenges.
Half American Native and tired of his association with the
Buffalo Bills circus (all of this only according to the
movie, mind you), he is approached by two Arabs, who tempt
him with the challenge of participating in a great race
that stretches thousands of miles in the Bedouinsthe
"ocean of fire," they call it, a place that has
housed an annual horse-racing competition for a thousand
years, but rewards only those few who can endure the elements
long enough to survive the extensive trek. Instinctively,
the script insists Frank take the challenge and sends he
and his horse thousands of miles across the globe to participate
in said race. But what hope of victory do either of them
have in a world that favors more professionally trained
riders and stallions?
This
could have easily been a platform for all sorts of personal
revelations for the Hopkins character, but the movie sidetracks
all of that via several supporting characters. One of the
most prominent: Sheikh Riyadh (Omar Sharif), a contest admirer
whose own sons died competing in past years, and is very
fascinated by the western culture that Frank brings to the
table with his arrival. There are also several antagonists
in the setup, such as Lady Davenport (Louise Lombard), a
fellow competitor who isn't about to see her prize-winning
Arabian stallion lose the game to a mixed breed like Hidalgo,
and Bin Al Reeh (Saïd Taghmaoui), who kidnaps the Sheikh's
daughter and thus gives the hero a chance to test out he
and his horse's resilience against cutthroat desert dwellers
while the race is at a pause. Is there a specific point
to either of them in this movie? Not really, other than
to keep the audience occupied with subplots while the script
tries to decide what it is going to do with the rest of
its time. The unfortunate part is that none of these characters
are ever very engaging or colorful; they come off more like
one-dimensional time fillers rather than significant story
players.
In
terms of hard story, the screenplay is frustratingly vague;
it's as if writer John Fusco put together a skeleton of
his premise and simply forgot to add in all the necessary
meat before it was time to photograph it. Even though the
film stresses the fact that both Hopkins and Hidalgo are
mixed breeds competing against all kinds of purebreds, there
is not so much as a hint of background provided to stress
that notion, and they inevitably become just overlooked
side details. In that respect, though, the specifics at
least stay true to the essence of the whole film itself;
as hard as it tries to be both adventurous and thought-provoking,
it is neither of those things. If not for the presence of
the stubborn horse, in fact, audiences might have fallen
asleep long before a climax was in sight.
Technically,
the movie has a few merits. In the attempt to capture the
look and feel of its period, the cinematographer puts a
great deal of concentration on wide-angled establishing
shots that are easily some of the best we've seen in recent
years for eastern hemisphere adventures. Having said that,
the editing of the film is also sharp and concise; even
when the movie utilized the characters for nothing more
than chase scenes or violent shoot-outs, you can at least
sense plausibility in their visual structure. But who on
Earth actually had the nerve to green-light this very transparent
screenplay? Whoever takes the blame, let us hope they realize
their mistake before they accidentally get their hands on
something with a lot more potential next time.
© 2004, David Keyes, Cinemaphile.org.
Please e-mail the author here
if the above review contains any spelling or grammar mistakes. |