Rating
-
Cast & Crew info:
Arnold Schwarzenegger
Terminator
Nick Stahl
John Connor
Claire Danes
Kate Brewster
Kristanna Loken
T-X
David Andrews
Robert Brewster
Mark Famiglietti
Scott Petersen
Produced by Moritz
Borman, Guy East, Gale Anne Hurd, Mario Kassar, Hal Lieberman,
Joel B. Michaels, Nigel Sinclair, Andrew G. Vajna and Colin
Wilson; Directed by Jonathan Mostow; Screenwritten
by John D. Brancato and Michael Ferris
Action/Science Fiction/Thriller
(US); Rated R for strong sci-fi violence and action,
and for language and brief nudity; Running Time - 125
Minutes
Official
Site
Domestic Release Date:
July 2, 2003
Review Uploaded
07/28/03 |
Written
by DAVID KEYES
During
the opening moments of "Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines,"
the voice of our hero John Connor informs the audience,
somewhat reluctantly, that the "future is not yet written."
This, however, is not the voice of the same John Connor
who has accepted a past plagued by memories of time-traveling
machines both sent to protect and destroy him; this is the
mentality of a full-grown man detached from reality, hopping
from one location to the next with minimal social contact
in hopes that denial will make all the trauma of his rocky
life disappear. But try as he might, those dark times still
follow him around like glaring physical scars, and the fact
that he tries so hard to hide them only prevents him from
leading the life he so clearly hopes is not ordained by
any specific destiny.
But
does one truly have absolute control over what is or is
not certain in the larger picture? This is one of the ideas
that the latest "Terminator" flick plays around
with, as it opens with one, then two, imminent shots in
which machines are hurled through a time vortex and are
dropped off in the present day.One, a cyborg in woman's
skin who is known as the TX (or "Terminatrix"),
has been sent back to eliminate possible supporters and
accomplists to Connor's inevitable resistance to the machines;
the other, a now-too-familiar T-800 whose primitive structure
is seconded to the fact that he remains the one machine
of the future who could be reprogrammed to serve humans,
is there to find and protect one of those targets as well
as Connor himself, who might also be in the line of fire
if the TX crosses his path. John knows this scenario all
too well, and yet when he is pulled back onto the radar,
perhaps not entirely by coincidence, he still refuses to
accept the possibility that some things in life may be out
of his control. "It doesn't have to be this way,"
he insists to his protector. Ah, but does he even believe
what he is saying to begin with? Like the movie he is surrounded
in, this rebellious and distraught target of destruction
is in a tug-of-war with fate that refuses to be resolved,
even when vague hints evolve into disturbing realities by
the time the plot sets the stage for its jolting finale.
"Terminator
3: Rise of the Machines" arrives 12 years after its
predecessor, the exciting and, at the time, cutting-edge
sci-fi thriller "Terminator 2: Judgment Day" (which
was also the rare sequel that far surpassed the offerings
of its original). In keeping with the tradition that was
established then, this offering is the rare closing chapter
of a trilogy that rewards, amazes, surprises and excites
viewers all while leaving them anxious for more. That's
no easy task for a franchise installment arriving on screen
so many years after the previous, but once the celluloid
drops its audience into its complex realities, somehow time
dissolves and the experience feels fresh again. To say that
it left me feeling giddy like a kid at a carnival is an
understatement; the movie is so robust with kinetic energy,
capturing the spirit of the summer blockbuster without always
doing things the ordinary way, my senses were almost overwhelmed
with adrenaline.
As
expected, the movie does not pick up where the last one
left us, either. Years upon years have come and gone in
the life of our hero, and though John Connor (Nick Stahl)
easily recalls those shocking confrontations with both protective
and destructive machines during his teen years, he would
like nothing better than to have them erased from his memory
bank. In the present day, the 20-something rebel practically
lives on the run, his motorcycle taking him from one small
town to the next as if staying in one spot makes him feel
like a sitting duck. After a highway accident that forces
him to seek shelter at a nearby animal hospital to recover,
he meets Kate Brewster (Claire Danes), an acquaintance from
his youth whom he last spoke to mere days before the events
of "T2" began to unfold. Kate now assumes he's
just a junkie in need of a fix, unaware of what has happened
in his traumatic life. But then a strange woman (Kristanna
Loken) breaks into the clinic and begins firing rounds of
ammunition, apparently seeking to kill her. Instead, the
woman finds proof thatthe infamous John Connor is alive,
well and possibly hiding nearby, which sets off a series
of events in which our hero relives the deadly chases of
his youth, Kate is brought into the deadly mix, and everyone's
favorite Terminator (Arnold Schwarzenegger) reappears to
protect both from the impending threat of the all new TX.
This
"Terminatrix," even more of an improvement over
the liquid metal T-100 of the last film, is a creature with
a seemingly endless arsenal of abilities, like shape-shifting,
identifying DNA samples by tasting them, utilizing multiple
weapons attached to her right arm (flame-thrower, anyone?),
and even hacking machines and hot-wiring them to perform
tasks that assist her in accomplishing her missions. She
is one big bad bitch, says I. And yet she still has weaknesses,
a crucial detail which the movie must use if it expects
us to believe that either of the human targets or the man-serving
T-800 could actually stand a chance at defeating her. And
even then, will her defeat really mean the end of this nightmare?
The movie tells us at one point that the climax of the last
film, contrary to popular belief, did not stop Judgment
Day from happeningit only delayed it. This time, the
looming threat of it is only hours away, which provides
a much more narrow (and tense) window for there to be any
sense of victory.
On
a visual scale, the movie is the most authentic-looking
in the "Terminator" series thus far; special effects
guru Stan Winston has not only cleaned up the advancements
he teased us with in "T2," but has also added
layers upon layers of the technical structure, giving the
machines both depth and pulse here when human flesh doesn't
cover the cold hard metal beneath it. There are also other
machines that populate the movie as well, like giant rotating
gunners that seek and destroy any moving target, and flying
ones that can scour hallways with ease while it searches
for its prey. Winston and his team have always been exceptional
artists for these kinds of movies, but here they have gone
above and beyond the call of duty. Here, special effects
don't make a conscious effort to be separate from the live
action, either; they simply blend in with the foreground
as if part of one real whole.
The
movie, directed by relative newcomer Jonathan Mostow, lacks
the mountain of new ideas that the first two films in the
series toyed with, but in ways that's an acceptable flaw,
because the concept of time travel lost its originality
long before this movie was even a reality. On that level,
Mostow is able to play with this concept in several other
distinctive wayslike with solid camerawork and focused
character developmentand although he packs his picture
with more chase scenes than necessary, he knows how to make
them exciting down to the last detail (who couldn't love
a sequence in which a machine demolishes block after block
with a large moving crane?). Besides, the movie's climax
is enough to excuse the lack of setup in earlier scenes;
it is not only a surprising ending, but a brave, thoughtful
and challenging one as well. At the end of "Terminator
3: Rise of the Machines," I was both satisfied and
grateful with the irony of the conclusion, and its effective
attempt to go against the grain of everything that was accomplished
before it. This is not just a summer blockbuster at its
most fattening, but also one at its most uniquely brilliant.
© 2003, David Keyes, Cinemaphile.org.
Please e-mail the author here
if the above review contains any spelling or grammar mistakes. |