Rating
-
Cast & Crew info:
Ray Wise
Jac Taggart
Jonathan Breck
The Creeper
Travis Schiffner
Izzy Bohen
Nicki Lynn Aycox
Nicki Aycox
Produced by Francis
Ford Coppola, Kirk D'Amico, Lucas Foster, Tom Luse, Bobby
Rock, Philip von Alvensleben; Directed and screenwritten
by Victor Salva
Horror (US);
Rated R for horror violence and language; Running
Time - 104 Minutes
Official
Site
Domestic Release Date:
August 29, 2003
Review Uploaded
09/26/03 |
Written
by DAVID KEYES
When
it comes to sequels, movie reviewers are ordinarily encouraged
to revisit an impending film's universe before even thinking
about seeing the follow-up, but that alas is a practice
I overlooked when it came to observing "Jeepers Creepers
2." According to a stack of promotional materials,
my only source of foreknowledge in the inevitable journey
to seeing this product, the film's predecessor sets a scenario
that is more or less a platform for countless franchise
installments; in other words, it suggests that any and all
future additions to a series will either a) depend on prior
events for any plot development, or b) simply repeat the
same exact setup over and over again without adding anything
other than higher body counts. We can usually get away with
bypassing older series installments if the latter selection
is implored (after all, what's the significance in revisiting
a series if it is merely repeating itself?), but on the
rare occasions that sequels are advancements of older stories,
acquaintance with the original premise is sometimes essential.
Thankfully,
however, watching this teenage horror flick without at first
viewing its predecessor doesn't really hinder any attempts
to look at the product objectively. No, not because it seems
to exist independently from the first film in the franchise,
but because no matter what may or may not have been accomplished
with the original installment, it still doesn't mean the
endeavor in front of us could be any less bad or appalling
than it already is. "Jeepers Creepers 2" is cut
from the same cloth that every other mindless horror film
has come from, a fabric that for some odd reason continues
to thrive even though the level of intelligence in the genre
has been upped by braver, more intelligent filmmakers in
the recent past.
Every
23rd spring for 23 days, the opening credits tell us, "it"
gets to feed. What "it" is exactly is a rather
irrelevant issue with movies about bloodthirsty creatures,
but I'll try to explain anyway: from what I can gather,
"it," better known to genre enthusiasts as "the
Creeper," is a large winged demon of sorts that looks
like a cross between Freddy Krueger and the gremlin from
"Twilight Zone," who every once in awhile swoops
down from the sky and snatches up an unsuspecting man or
woman, presumably to take them off and feast on them. The
movie itself opens on the 22nd day of this 23-day-long cannibal
harvest, in a scene so well shot and choreographed that
it seems misplaced and unwarranted in contrast with the
movie's other sequences. In it, we see a farmer and his
two sons off doing yard maintenance, the youngest son hitching
scarecrows up to poles scattered across an open corn field.
The kid glances over his shoulder and thinks he sees one
of the scarecrows move. He runs; it runs after him. The
kid yells, but it's not enough time for older brother and
dad to catch up to the lad, who is now at the mercy of the
Creeper and is being dragged along the crops before being
pulled into the air and vanishing from of sight. After it
is all over, the father resolves to avenge the apparent
death of his youngest boy by killing the Creeper himself,
a task that, while rigorous, will probably be made a lot
easier when the man unleashes his arsenal of powerful homemade
weapons designed exclusively for slaughtering the demon.
What
follows in the shadow of this premise is one of the most
long and stupid predicament plots I have seen in ages (a
"predicament plot," for those unfamiliar with
the term, refers to a story arc in which every bad thing
possible conveniently happens in order for the characters
to be dragged into the impending bloodshed). A bunch of
varsity basketball high school kids, led by a racist egomaniac,
are on their way home after successfully defeating their
opponents in a recent game when suddenly one of the bus's
tires goes flat. Upon investigation, it is revealed that
the tire was flattened quite possibly on purposeremenants
of some sort of ninja star made of bone and flesh are found
sticking out of the side of the rubber. And so comes the
inevitable conflict when night falls and people get periodically
picked off by the creeper whenever they step outside of
the bus. The teens realize their dilemma and start turning
on each other in panic, although luckily, one of their own
just happens to be a psychic and has been told in her dreams
all about the winged creature who threatens their very lives.
This
is not merely a bad concept, but a dumb and irrelevant onean
idea that feels like it was left over from some drug-induced
brainstorming session in the basement of amateur B-movie
directors. And even that could have been forgiven had the
movie actually tried to have fun with the idea in the first
place, but it does not. The movie plods along between plot
points without any direction; the Creeper captures victims,
flies, tears off body parts to replace those of his that
are damaged, and every once in awhile stops to observe one
of the imprisoned teens go into shrieking mode. It is established
at one point that the demon is actually targeting specific
victims based on how much they fear him; thus, to pass time
during slow moments, the teens rant at each other about
whose fault the whole thing is and who should be sacrificed
in order to save the others. By actually allowing any of
its characters to believe for one second that a winged demon
is simply gonna stop the havoc if he gets his claws on one
more person, the movie violates an essential rule in the
horror movieno core character should ever assume that
you can bargain easily with a flesh-eater.
As
for the Creeper himself? Here, at least, is one movie villain
that does not deserve the fate that waits for him in the
movie's climactic moments. Aside from being wise enough
to avoid exposure to all the idiotic teen chatter that saturates
the picture (being off camera for long periods of time does
have its advantages), he single-handedly resolves one of
the film's core problems by eating those who tend to irritate
us the most. The only major quibble I have with the ending,
in fact, is that the Creeper isn't allowed to finish the
job before he is stopped dead in his tracks. The fact that
any teen from this film survives, leaving the door open
for possibly more sequels, is the scariest thing I have
seen all year.
© 2003, David Keyes, Cinemaphile.org.
Please e-mail the author here
if the above review contains any spelling or grammar mistakes. |