Written
by DAVID KEYES
Theories about extraterrestrials have been used for entertainment
as far back as movie cameras have been in operation, sometimes
being so relentlessly exercised that the novelty of the
concept quickly and easily becomes just another cliché
in most modern motion picture circuits. In the literal dawn
of mankind's space exploration, however, concern with movie
formula is traditionally suspended because of the countless
unanswered questions that continue to result from our uncertainty,
and audiences continue to flock to the multiplex in search
of new ideas and assumptions on the topic. As fascinating
as it all may be, however, we still can't forget that movies
are not always the most accurate reflections of reality,
either; although there is much room to speculate on what
exists beyond the Earth's atmosphere, especially in art,
there is only so many times an idea can be twisted and reshaped
before it begins to lose its elasticity.
In most regards, you have to admire director M. Night Shyamalan's
zealous gesture with "Signs," a film that is being
pitched to the viewer as a thriller with a focus on visitors
from unknown worlds. There is a solid conviction rooted
deep within this particular endeavor that is seldom seen
in most alien-fueled flicks, one that embraces unique strategies
without abandoning logic or reality in the grand process.
While the result is never quite as original or potent as
Shyamalan hopes it will be, it has the distinction of being
one of the few films in the recent past to slightly challenge
and contort this rubik's cube of a concept. That may not
be enough to earn the trust of every moviegoer, but it's
enough for me.
What is most astonishing about "Signs," however,
has nothing to do with how it dodges and deflects the obstacles
of its subject matter. The movie is a surprisingly well-made
and thoughtful excursion into multiple territories, conducted
as a deep psychological thriller with just minor brushes
of the obligatory science fiction elements. This isn't a
film about an all-out war being waged between the human
race and its unknown opposition; it's about the paranoia
and fear of such a scenario as it begins to configure itself
in the minds of nonbelievers. Shyamalan's vision does not
necessarily want to make decisions about extraterrestrials,
either; in his mysterious and ambiguous atmosphere, distinguishing
details about the aliens themselves are sketchy at best
and generally avoided (with brief exceptions during crucial
plot twists). He knows that visitors from other worlds are
only as disturbing as the viewers makes them, and on those
grounds the picture is a minefield for numerous plausible
interpretations.
During the film's calm but generally slow opening act,
we meet up with the secluded and simple Hess family, a group
of farmers in a rural Pennsylvanian community who are the
target of a mysterious occurrence. Graham (Mel Gibson) is
the family's center, a former church minister whose wife
was killed in a car accident a couple of years before. His
brother Merrill (Joaquin Phoenix) is a skeptical man and
former minor league baseball star; his son Morgan (Rory
Culkin) is fascinated by things out of the ordinary, and
his daughter Bo (Abigail Breslin) is a mysterious young
being who is extremely picky about the quality of her drinking
water. In the movie's opening shots, the family is drawn
to the large cornfields just beyond the farmhouse, where
countless crops have been flattened to create large and
ominous shapes from views high in the sky. Local law enforcement
and Graham all assume that these findings are all the result
of a prank from teenagers in the local area, but the puzzling
thing is that each and every stalk of corn is snapped at
a precise point and laid down in a constant direction without
any further damage, which makes the odds of city kids pulling
a hoax very unlikely.
Soon the news channels are bombarded with reports of these
mysterious "crop circles" showing up in different
areas of the globe, appearing so rapidly and densely that
worldwide concern and wonder begins to escalate. Graham
tries repeatedly to keep his family out of the loop on these
details because he doesn't really believe them himself,
but new evidence continues to fall at their feet at an alarming
rate: trash cans are invaded by unseen and swift shadows,
sounds are emerging from the corn fields, and the old family
baby monitor is picking up frequencies that reveal some
kind of alien-like communication. Without giving too many
specifics away, the family's sense of security begins teetering
on the edge of complete meltdown as these details slowly
build,, and once their fears are realized by the impending
doom of the world around them, they find themselves struggling
for their own survival.
Generally speaking, Shyamalan's skills as a moviemaker
have been questionable up to this point, as his first two
screen efforts"The Sixth Sense" and "Unbreakable"have
lacked the necessary substance to complement his constantly-observant
approaches. With this subject matter, he has finally found
something to suit his quiet but intriguing style, a premise
that has been in search of someone whose simplicity could
breathe new meaning into its message. There is, however,
still a few kinks he needs to work out behind the camera;
more often than necessary, for example, his subtlety as
a thrill-driver, although responsible for quite a few effective
shocks during the movie's middle act, can have the unfortunate
outcome of being dry (particularly during some of the early
dialogue exchanges). None of that should matter compared
to the strengths, though; the movie's script is tight and
well-established, the brilliant musical score evokes the
nostalgia of the great chords from the Hitchcock classics,
and its characters are written with enough stability and
compassion to reach the audience's emotional core. If you
look at "Signs" as a whole package and not on
individual terms, then the result is a worthwhile and thought-provoking
experience.