Written
by DAVID KEYES
If society was allowed to function the way that the characters
in "Pumpkin" do, life would be a series of "Leave
it to Beaver" reruns in which your identity was decided
by how plastic and shallow you could be. With such thoroughly
calculated ineptitude, the movie imbeds these traits into
the film's players the instant they arrive on screen, saturating
their psyches in all the familiar sitcom traits until they're
too far gone to be saved. But this rather devastating property
is only a small clue as to what horror the movie truly volunteers,
and by the time the film reaches its final act, most of
us are too limp from frustration to even care what happens
next.
It's a mystery how the movie could be released in this
condition. "Pumpkin" is a nasty, smug, shameless
and implausible mess that infuriated me in nearly every
way possible. Not only does it relinquish coherence and
logic, it also has no clue about what it takes to be a genuine
or respectable human being. Every ounce of energy that is
conveyed by the talented cast is in vein;they are quickly
and unfairly abandoned in a minefield of conflicting ideas
and statements, lacking the necessary intelligence to help
them navigate their way out of the chaos.
The film's star victim is Christina Ricci, an amazing young
actress who, with "The Opposite of Sex," "Buffalo
66" and "Sleepy Hollow," broke free from
the restraints enforced by being a child movie star in Hollywood.
She plays Carolyn McDuffy, a pretty sorority sister of the
Alpha Omega Pi house, who along with her fellow sisters
are trying to come up with ways of beating their competitors,
the Tri-Omegas, for the coveted prize of Sorority of the
Year at Southern California State University. In Carolyn's
cheery world, everything is in perfect balanceher
family, her friends, her popularity, and her boyfrienduntil
the house decides to compete against their rivals by training
mentally challenged teens to compete in an upcoming special
Olympics. The problem she has with this proposed undertaking
isn't exactly clear, however; at one point, she and one
of her sisters challenge the questionable motives behind
the sorority's undertaking, and later during the actual
training, she runs away screaming like a banshee, upset
that her challenged athlete is even looking at her.
The athlete in question, incidentally, is where "Pumpkin"
gets its title; it's the offbeat name assigned to a quiet,
wheelchair-bound teen boy (Hank Harris), who as we learn
through scenes at home, lives a sheltered life with a mother
who still treats him like a 5-year-old. Pumpkin has a lot
more potential than most give him credit for, however, and
when he makes the connection with Carolyn, a deep desire
to prove his talent to the world is greatly spurred. But
Carolyn's attempts to remain distant from the situation
is the premise's immediate conflict; she fears being part
of the life of someone who is less than perfect just because
it might jolt her out of her own plastic reality.
For the first half hour, "Pumpkin" appears to
be going somewhere with its material, relying on wit and
irony to convey itself in a true satirical manner. But as
we begin to peel back the layers behind the players that
drive the screenplay, we realize just how empty everything
is. Not one person on screen is even remotely sympathetic
or believable, with the sole exception being Pumpkin himself
who, despite his mental limitations, is quite possibly the
most intelligent person within the picture. Carolyn enters
the scenario as a poster child for cheerleader-type naivety,
and yet when her world is turned topsy-turvy by her mentally
challenged athlete, her views of life and people seem to
change almost instantaneously, despite being just as transparent
and detestable as they were beforehand. Pumpkin's mother
Judy (Brenda Blethyn), meanwhile, is always convinced she
is doing what's right for her son's safety, although when
the chips are down, she's more motivated by her reputation
rather than the well-being of her son.
The movie's most unforgivable flaw is the contrived tone
that the screenplay incessantly tries to force-feed the
audience. Consider a scene when Carolyn's boyfriend Kent
(Sam Ball) takes off speeding down a highway after being
dumped by his girlfriend and being punched by a defensive
Pumpkin. Kent is frustrated and angered to the point of
tears, and he pounds on the gas petal like there's no tomorrow.
In the blink of an eye, he misses the road and his car goes
off a cliff, exploding in midair as if the gas line has
been broken by impact with the cliffside (although the vehicle
never tumbles on rocks during its free-fall). The next morning,
Carolyn is summoned to the hospital, where Kent is lying
in a bed, paralyzed from the waste down but without so much
as a slight burn mark in sight. "Now I'm handicapped
like Pumpkin," he says to his former love. Gee, and
here we thought you were disabled before!
When you multiply this scenario by eight or nine, what
you get is the entire final act of "Pumpkin,"
which is simply a series of useless, boring and pathetically
executed false endings that never seem to end when they
should. So relentless and disheartening are these scenes
that when the actual conclusion is in fact upon us, we don't
truly believe it until the credits finish rolling and the
projector shuts off.
I suppose there is an underlying meaning behind the crazy
shenanigans of this ho-hum endeavor, but even if I began
to understand them, it's unlikely that I'd be any less frustrated
with this travesty. Satire may be one of the few genres
that can successfully stretch into bizarre yet flamboyant
territory, but what's the point of trying if the only person
we feel a connection toward hardly says a word during the
whole two-hour ordeal?