Rating
-
Cast & Crew
info:
Heath Ledger:
William Thatcher
Mark Addy:
Roland
Rufus Sewell:
Count Adhemar
Paul Bettany:
Chaucer
Shannyn Sossamon:
Jocelyn
Alan Tudyk:
Wat
Produced by Todd Black, Brian Helgeland and Tim Van
Rellim; Directed and screenwritten by Brian Helgeland
Action/Comedy (US); Rated PG-13 for action
violence, some nudity and brief sex-related dialogue; Running
Time -132 Minutes
Official
Site
Domestic Release Date
May 11, 2001
Review Uploaded
6/01/01 |
Written
by DAVID KEYES "A
Knight's Tale" tries very hard to be one of the year's most
carefree good times, but its lapse in logic creates a deafening
interference for the moviegoer to deal with. Few people have
probably not heard by now about how the movie uses a classic
rock soundtrack against a medieval setting, but even fewer
might not realize just what kind of intense distraction this
has on us, not just as sensible viewers but as moviegoers
in the spirit of silly summer thrills. It's great to have
fun, but even the most mindless occasions call for a little
plausibility, and this is the kind of movie that has no interest
whatsoever in at least operating inside respectable boundaries.
But
for a moment, let's toss the soundtrack aside. What is left
underneath? Not much of anything, sadly. The movie is badly
edited, unfocused, misleading, boring, and clearly uninterested
in establishing a central tone to carry the elements. For
one brief moment, we admire director Brian Helgeland's ability
to enthusiastically play out the story's numerous events,
but when he manages to splinter the it through action, parody,
romance and even sappy and manipulative melodrama, how in
the world is the audience supposed to react? This is the
kind of movie that gives new meaning to the phrase "you'll
laugh till you cry."
The
star of the picture is Heath Ledger, an admirable young
actor whom served as one of the only redeeming qualities
in last year's painful war epic "The Patriot." Here, he
plays William Thatcher, an ambitious would-be jousting warrior
who seeks out to rise above his status as a mere peasant
and become the greatest knight the jousting rings of France
have ever seen. To do that, though, his identity as a servant
must be protected, and the friends that accompany him throughout
his (mis)adventures help to ensure its secrecy (one of whom
is actually Geoffrey Chaucer, the author of "The Canterbury
Tales"). Unfortunately, Thatcher's prime nemesis in tournament,
the creepy Count Adhemar (Rufus Sewell), knows too much
about Thatcher's actual identity and is on the verge of
exposing the young soldier for the phony he is.
The
picture is like "The Mummy Returns" with the bandages removed--filled
with endless but intentional contradictions, minus a noteworthy
excitement factor and a thread of minimum common decency.
We can find it possible to live with many of the inadequacies
here (even the silly Nike product placement found within
the film is forgivable), but the overall effect is less
than acceptable when we see an audience cheering to the
tune of "We Will Rock You," and a court of royalty dancing
to the lyrics of David Bowie's "Golden Years." The movie's
most curious mystery, though, is how it manages to be so
careless with the setting, focusing in on the 14th century
as if poverty, heated war and pestilence were not even around
then. Plus, the movie takes place in France, and the majority
of the cast speaks in British accents. Was this anachronism
intentional, or just a mere oversight by either the writer
or the director? As if an answer would matter.
When
it comes to style, "A Knight's Tale" feels very reminiscent
of Luc Besson's "The Messenger," adopting set design and
costumes that are seemingly simple but elaborate around
the edges. Unfortunately, his material feels more like an
early draft of ideas than a complete script. When his characters
are not roaming through the scenery like lost dogs, his
narrative travels like maple syrup through an ice maze--slow
and disoriented, sometimes going in circles because it doesn't
have clear sense of direction. Now that I think of it, maybe
it isn't so crazy that the soundtrack distracts us from
the substance. It's not like those of us annoyed by the
music will miss anything.
©
2001, David Keyes, Cinemaphile.org.
Please e-mail the author here
if the above review contains any spelling or grammar mistakes. |