Rating
-
Horror (US);
2000; Rated R; 116 Minute
Cast
David Arquette: Dwight "Dewey" Riley
Neve Campbell: Sidney Prescott
Courteney Cox Arquette: Gale Weathers
Patrick Dempsey: Detective Kincaid
Scott Foley: Roman Bridger
Produced by Stuart M. Besser, Dixie J. Capp, Cary
Granat, Cathy Konrad, Marianne Maddalena, Julie Plec, Andrew
Rona, Bob Weinstein, Harvey Weinstein and Kevin Williamson;
Directed by Wes Craven; Screenwritten by Ehren
Krueger; based on the characters created by Kevin
Williamson
Review Uploaded
2/07/00
|
Written
by DAVID KEYES Wes
Craven may very well be one of the most unconventional horror
movie directors working in the cinema today, and that may
be an understatement considering his marvelous history with
the horror genre. Beginning a career without any knowledge
in technical aspects of a motion picture is not always the
first sign of a prominent filmmaker, but that little education
helped shape the bitter and brutal substance of his debut
effort, "Last House On The Left" in 1972, into something
that horrified anyone who saw it. That film, at least for
those who know it even exists, succeeded immensely, and
he has since then gone on to make movies ideal for teenagers
who have a thirst for bloodshed and ingenuity. Some of his
projects--like "A Nightmare On Elm Street"--even go on to
become cult classics. Others--like "The Serpent And The
Rainbow"--are forgotten almost as soon as they arrive on
screens.
In
either case (and in most situations the first choice applies),
everything he touches searches for a new horizon to shed
light on. His most recent horror works, the entries to the
Kevin Williamson saga "Scream," take the slasher formula
and rip it apart using characters with brains as the cutup
tools. It is a given that teen horror flicks will be filled
with gore and gratuitous violence; here, something else
entirely overshadows the massacre.
Each
film approaches the material in unpredictable yet satisfying
ways. In the original "Scream," characters were big fans
of horror movies, but repeated these relentless clichés
during a series of horror-style killings going on in and
around their hometown of Woodsboro. In "Scream 2," the survivors
of the first picture tried to move on with their lives,
but a slasher film named "Stab" was in theaters chronicling
the real events of their lives, and a killer on a college
campus was attempting to create a real life sequel to them.
"Scream 3," the end of the highly successful series, has
an even more intriguing concept--what if Hollywood, obsessed
with dragging out horror stories, decided to take the true
events of "Stab" and continue them with a sequel of faux
circumstances? Furthermore, what if someone decided to turn
that script into real life by duplicating the murders page
for page?
The
movie chronicles the making of "Stab 3," the third and final
entry to the series revolved around the murders of Sidney
Prescott and her friends (keep in mind, though, that the
"Stab" pictures are movies within the "Scream" pictures).
Whereas the first two "Stab" movies were based on truth,
"Stab 3" is being completely developed by fabrication, using
the lives of the actual victims to extend the franchise
(not to mention using the same ghost-face costume that has
become legendary among the survivors of the killings).
Something
odd happens during its production--real murders start happening,
usually to those who have an association with the making
of this mad slasher. And what's most intriguing is that
the killer is slashing victims in the order that they are
killed off in the "Stab 3" script. Not surprisingly, three
completely different versions of the screenplay exist, so
it is impossible to predict who will be next on the agenda
(a cop suggests that the three scripts are in print to keep
the secrets of "Stab 3" off of the Internet).
Returning
to end the series are Courteney Cox Arquette as Gale Weathers,
David Arquette as Dewey, and Neve Campbell as Sidney Prescott
(among others). These three are, (no duh) the main survivors
of the incidents at Woodsboro ("Scream") and Widsor College
("Scream 2"), who have tried to move on with their lives
but have failed to put the past behind them. Ms. Prescott,
for example, now resides in the hills of Hollywood, working
out of her home as a crisis operator but living in seclusion
(as if she's afraid that the outside world will only cause
her pain and suffering).
Dewey
and Gale have similar ways of handling their lives; she
still works as the journalist intent on uncovering deep
secrets no matter who gets hurt, and Dewey has become a
consultant, so to speak, on the set of "Stab 3." The latter
two players have been the most amusing in the series because
of their intense chemistry, and much of that is reflected
here in the third film (although Gale admits that their
relationship, hot and heavy by the end of "Scream 2," failed
to work out because of their differences). One of the hidden
traits of trilogies is that actors reprising their characters
seem to grow board with the material. Yet all three of the
main players, no matter how difficult the situations they
are in, seem to be enjoying their screen time here; they
have acquired the extensive knowledge of what similarities
their situations share with horror films, and do not hold
back their feelings for one moment.
At
the opening of the picture (briefly following a surprising
intro of murders), Gale is approached by the police, who
need help in determining what the motive is for the new
slew of killings. Her investigation takes her directly to
the set of "Stab 3," where she encounters former acquaintance
Deputy Dewey working as a consultant for the production.
Even more striking than his presence is actress Parker Posey,
who is set to play Gale Weathers, and winds up following
the real reporter around for the duration of the movies
trying to understand the character she is portraying. Things
are fairly tight around the set of "Stab 3," however, and
Gale is dismissed without picking up any clues.
More
murders take place. Panic forces a shutdown of the production
of "Stab 3." Growing fear overwhelms the remaining cast
members, as the killer continues murdering victims in the
order they die in the script. Unfortunately, no one knows
exactly which version of the screenplay the murderer has
read, and during one of the most tense moments of the picture,
the killer faxes his next moves to a house containing several
potential victims only seconds before they happen, giving
the people little or no time to react.
There
are further intriguing developments (I intentionally leave
out most), and among them are the abrupt arrival of series
veteran Sidney Prescott, and the discovery of a video made
by now-deceased movie expert Randy (who is sort of like
a survival guide for those closely involved to the murders).
Actor Jamie Kennedy makes an extra-special guest appearance
here, playing his departed character just before the murders
at Widsor college claimed his own life. Randy insists, however,
that he knew he would die there; this video was made not
to say good-bye, but to help out any survivors through the
final act of the real-life horror trilogy they were living.
Whereas
the other movies combined horror with a satirical tone,
"Scream 3" presents its material as some real somber stuff,
concentrating more on the mayhem and less on the jokes (although
many of the gags are the funniest in the entire series).
Much of the cause for this change of pace belongs to the
change in writers; Craven became fed up at the last minute
with Kevin Williamson's treatment and brought another writer
on board. At first glance, Ehren Krueger appeared to be
an unlikely candidate for filling the original writer's
shoes. But Williamson's version of "Scream 3" demanded that
the series return back to Woodsboro, essentially repeating
the scenario of the first "Scream" picture. Krueger's interpretation
is much more risky without the wit, and yet so much more
compelling; rather than rehashing ideas, it takes the players
right to the source of this nightmare: the minds of Hollywood,
who churn out slasher films at a relentless rate. If the
transformation requires less silly scenes and more serious
ones, than so be it.
The
movie is also a work of technical genius, using cameras
with a swooping style to capture the characters as they
are chased through halls and passageways at top speed. Many
movies lack attractive camerawork when it comes to pursuing
people through all sorts of narrow territory (even the first
"Scream" pictures were a little jumbled), but "Scream 3"
proves to be quite effective in keeping the action clear
and focused. This will be helpful, indeed, as there is plenty
of gruesome murder taking place throughout the movie. Whoever
said that the picture's body count was decreased due to
the recent violence in schools was obviously full of hot
air.
"Scream
3" is quite a surprise, in the manner that it preserves
the innovation of the series rather than succumbing to all
those clichés plaguing the genre in general. Perhaps the
only thing preventing it from being perfect, like its predecessors,
is the ending; why do Craven and his writer insist on dragging
out the climax to such a frustrating length? The identity
of the killer is not the downside at all; the only problem
is, when everything is revealed, the plot twists do not
stop. Many will grow tired of waiting for some sort of resolution
to set in.
Still,
matched up to the previous entries, the movie stands tall
and proud (although "Scream 2" is the best of the series
because of its ability to handle numerous characterizations
with genuine depth). Will the audience respond in the same
way? I believe so; this is, after all, a franchise that
has gathered a large turnout for each of its previous chapters.
Anyone who has seen the series through its first two entries
will likely want to see the third, if only to tie up all
those loose ends. Whether or not they will embrace it like
the first two is left up to the imagination.
Who
is killed and whom they are killed by are secrets that have
to be seen for themselves; so horrifying are some of the
murders that the typical English language cannot begin to
describe the alarm many will experience. And somehow, through
all of these gratuitous occurrences, many will take away
a valuable message here as people continue to debate whether
or not movies like these encourage American youth to resort
to violence. All the "Scream" pictures calmly echo a perpetual
theme, and "Scream 3" delivers the moral for what the entire
series has tried to say right from the beginning: life does
not intimidate art, even if there are people out there more
twisted than any of the ghost-face killers.
©
2000,
David Keyes, Cinemaphile.org.
Please e-mail the author here
if the above review contains any spelling or grammar mistakes. |