Rating
-
Thriller
(US); 1999/2000; Rated R; 100 Minutes
Cast
Winona Ryder: Maya Larkin
Ben Chaplin: Peter Kelson
Sarah Wynter: Claire Van Owen
John Hurt: Father Lareaux
Alfre Woodard: Psychiatrist
Produced by Christopher Cronyn, Michael De Luca,
Donna Langley, Meg Ryan and Nina R. Sadowsky; Directed
by Janusz Kaminski; Screenwritten by Pierce Gardner
and Betsy Stahl
Review Uploaded
11/03/00 |
Written
by DAVID KEYES There
is a background history attached to “Lost Souls” that may
be long and involved, but is certainly more entertaining
to hear about than watching the movie itself. Because religious
thrillers have been showing up in theaters over the past
year quite frequently, the movie’s makers chose to postpone
the intended release date—late 1999—until the calendar was
cleared of anything similar. Only one problem, though: trailers
had already surfaced on new releases late last summer, and
with the eminent delay, moviegoers could have easily grown
tired of the wait and forgot about the picture altogether.
Now that it has finally arrived in theaters, hopefully audiences
will do just that.
Why,
exactly? Because after all the hype, and all the releases
preceding it that we can compare it with—“Stigmata,” “End
Of Days,” “The Ninth Gate,” “Bless The Child,” and even
the director’s cut release of “The Exorcist”—“Lost Souls”
is one of the most pathetic and halfhearted attempts at
horror you could ever imagine, with a story that wreaks
of idiocy, and characters that seem to drift off into space
just when they are launched onto the screen. Even the movie’s
style, which was at least enticing by the previews, is lifeless,
murky and depressing; it’s as if the studio dipped the film
into a vat of bleach before distributing it.
The
film stars Winona Ryder as Maya Larkin, an eccentric young
woman who was once possessed by the devil (or so flashbacks
try to indicate), and has lived a sheltered life because
of it. At the opening of the picture, she is whisked back
into the battle of evil when Father Lareaux (John Hurt),
who is sort of a leader in a bandwagon of exorcists, informs
her of a possession taking place across town in a mental
ward. When all of them get together to perform an exorcism
on the man, who is also a known serial killer, we bear witness
to loud noises, a door banging and flashes of light, but
no direct visualization of the occurrences. When security
busts down the door to the cell to investigate the violent
disturbances, Lareaux collapses in utter shock and the possessed
man slips into a deep coma.
While
there, Maya acquires a series of papers with numbers written
all over them. Through some sort of decoding system, she
learns that one of the messages spells out the name Peter
Kelson (Ben Chaplin), who, as luck would have it, is a local
author who has just written a book on a newly-convicted
serial killer. Through several other connections (most of
which defy explanation), it is revealed that Kelson is actually
the vessel for which Satan will assume human form and be
born into the world as the antichrist, and Maya rushes to
warn the man of his fate before the transformation takes
place (and for some reason, it’s scheduled on the exact
minute of his 33rd birthday).
With
this kind of premise, it’s easy to assume the movie at least
has all sorts of pleasing visual gimmicks for the viewer
to gawk at. But “Lost Souls” has little of this to offer;
in fact, aside from loud noises and demonic voices here
and there, most of the action either takes place behind
closed doors where we can’t see it, or is halted before
it has a chance to manifest. There is a moment towards the
end when Father Lareaux becomes possessed himself, and Maya
is forced to perform an exorcism on him; much like the first
ceremony performed at the beginning of the film, this all
takes place in a darkened room where nothing can be seen
of the actual ceremony other than a shaking door and creepy
voices.
The
first exorcism uses this kind of subtlety to create a sense
of foreboding atmosphere, but what’s the point of it being
used the second time much later in the picture? Does the
director assume we can’t take the ferocity by then? Or is
he just taking an easy way out so he can approach the climax
faster? The actors, particularly Ryder and Chaplin, seem
to suffer the most here; they look so bored with the material
that they stare into each other’s eyes as if they’re trying
not to laugh hysterically.
The
director here is Janusz Kaminski, the talented photographer
that gave “Schindler’s List” and “Saving Private Ryan” their
intense, realistic edge. If only this movie’s cinematographer,
Mauro Fiore, had similar enthusiasm; the drab, gloomy texture
of the film is backed by lots of ambiguous camera shots
and fragmented edits, which not only undermine the mood,
but disorient the audience as it attempts to make sense
of the narrative. Towards the end, after spending countless
time investigating the prophecy that will turn Kelson into
the antichrist, both Maya and Peter finally arrive at a
decision that will effect the outcome of this transformation:
a decision that leads to a brief moment of tension, a swift
climax, and then the closing credits. Funny how in movies
like this, everyone seems to wait until the last minute
to take action against something that could easily be halted
right from the beginning.
©
2000,
David Keyes, Cinemaphile.org.
Please e-mail the author here
if the above review contains any spelling or grammar mistakes. |