Rating
-
Action/Drama
(US); 2000; Rated R; 102 Minutes
Cast
Sylvester Stallone: Jack Carter
Miranda Richardson: Gloria Carter
Rachael Leigh Cook: Doreen Carter
Michael Caine: Cliff Brumby
Alan Cumming: Jeremy Kinnear
Mickey Rourke: Cyrus Paice
Produced by Ashok Amritraj, Steve Bing, Mark Canton,
Neil Canton, Don Carmody, Bill Gerber, John Goldstone, James
A. Holt, Kevin King, Dawn Miller, Elie Samaha, Arthur Silver
and Andrew Stevens; Directed by Stephen Kay; Screenwritten
by David McKenna; based on the novel “Jack’s Return
Home” by Ted Lewis
Review Uploaded
12/08/00 |
Written
by DAVID KEYES Remember
that little running gag in the “Lethal Weapon” pictures
where Danny Glover takes a deep breath after a physical
stunt and announces that “he’s getting too old for this?”
Perhaps Sylvester Stallone could take a study course on
it. The now middle-aged but still-beefed up action star
makes his anticipated return to the big screen from a three-year
absence in “Get Carter,” with what one might assume is a
departure role from his “Rambo”/“Rocky” days, but is actually
no more than the routine, stamina-driven muscle man he has
played throughout his career. The only significant difference
this time around (other than the newly sophisticated wardrobe)
is that the audience may have finally come to the realization
of how tired and generic all of this really is. Stallone
is a gifted actor in some aspects, no doubt, but is it possible
to continuously take the same playing field without ever
collapsing from exhaustion?
That’s
not to say the movie he’s in is a total loss, though; if
you strip the material of its ineffective level of performances,
what we are left with is a concept that, at least at the
core, is quite intriguing. In the movie, which is actually
a loose remake of a 1971 film done by director Michael Hodges,
Stallone plays Jack Carter, a mob enforcer, of sorts, who
returns home from Vegas to the funeral of his brother, who
"mysteriously" died just a few days before. The reports
suggest a car accident; Jack, a man with the observance
skills of a feline, suspects fowl play. But who could possibly
be involved in his brother's demise? Eventually the choice
has been brought down to three likely suspects, but anyone
who has seen these kinds of films knows the formula all
too well to be surprised at the identity of the real villain.
"Get
Carter" boasts a splendid ensemble cast that, interestingly
enough, are used fairly well throughout the script. Alan
Cumming, a famous Broadway star, plays the first suspect:
a computer nerd whose wealth is derived from online porn
services. Then there's Mickey Rourke and Michael Caine,
both playing other suspects, dealing in similar venues,
followed by Miranda Richardson as Carter's sister-in-law,
who is not exactly happy that her brother-in-law is back
in town. These are terrific actors, and for a while, the
screenplay knows how to handle them as important people,
using them as much as possible so as not to deteriorate
their significance.
Alas,
that is a goal that is eroded by a final act filled with
inconclusive and peculiar resolutions. Towards the end,
things begin to get very muddled and heavy, with surprise
plot twists seeping through the cracks so densely that they
practically choke the characters in half. And the action,
while not totally overblown (in fact, it could be said there's
less than you'd expect), is the routine, in-your-face stuff
you've seen in a handful of previous Stallone films. I'm
not saying the action is bad--just clichéd.
"Get
Carter" is not a horrible film by any means—it has some
terrific qualities: certainly more than I can say for the
last Stallone picture "Cop Land" (which can now be known
as the film that put a three-year halt on Sly's motion picture
career). For example, the cinematography here brilliantly
echoes "Payback," with its blue-tinted style and noirish
atmosphere encompassing the narrative as if it were a narrator
warning the viewer of the darker extents. It's just the
timing and the execution of the movie that really nags us
in the end. Should you see it? Only if you're a die-hard
Stallone fanatic. Otherwise, it would be wiser to stick
with the more interesting and exciting new Schwarzenegger
flick, "The Sixth Day."
©
2000,
David Keyes, Cinemaphile.org.
Please e-mail the author here
if the above review contains any spelling or grammar mistakes. |