Rating
-
Thriller
(US); 2000; Rated R; 109 Minutes
Cast
Ewan McGregor: The Eye
Ashley Judd: Joanna
Patrick Bergin: Alex Leonard
k.d. Lang: Hilary
Jason Priestley: Gary
Geneviève Bujold: Dr. Brault
Produced by Manon Bougie, Al Clark, Nicolas Clermont,
Mark Damon, Hilary Shor and Tony Smith; Directed and
screenwritten by Stephan Elliott; based on the novel
by Marc Behm
Review Uploaded
1/31/00 |
Written
by DAVID KEYES Stephan
Elliot's "Eye Of The Beholder" is truly something that has
to be seen to be believed; a movie that forces the main
character to pursue a merciless man killer, and then tries
to be all noble by slapping in brief shots of religious
statues and tears falling from the murderers face, as if
homicide is not enough to keep her dull life occupied. Such
a treatment is almost deserving of every criticism it gets,
since it believes anyone with half a brain could find a
single frame of this picture even slightly amusing. Those
who say that new and invigorating ideas for movies are not
all they're cracked up to be might have had this travesty
in mind--by combining sorrow with suspense and love with
obsession, the film leaves the moviegoer with a nasty aftertaste.
There
is not one distinct tone in any of the many scenarios; sometimes
the film aims for sentiment, sometimes it tries to be funny,
other times it wants to be completely revolting. What's
even more distracting is that multiple moods can often be
found in the same scenes, usually beginning with a hoot
from the audience and ending in a shriek of terror. The
first killing is a prime target for speculation of this
gimmick--Ashley Judd, who plays our homicidal maniac in
question, picks up on a wealthy man who is caught stealing
from his trust fund, and takes him home for, supposedly,
a little hanky-panky. She lays down a sheet of plastic,
covers his eyes by tying his tie around his head and excuses
herself for a brief moment. Suddenly there is a brief expectation
of sexual imagery. Then Judd draws a knife, reenters the
room and ruthlessly slashes her victim while he is unable
to comprehend what is going on. Does any of this sound like
"Friday The 13th," or what?
"Eye
Of The Beholder" is about a member of the British embassy,
who is assigned to take on tasks that only the most intelligent
and sharp individuals could hope to get away with. Appropriately
named the "Eye," this observant man has just come across
an important case, involving a man's theft from a trust
fund, and the woman he is involved with. Halfway through
the investigation, his focus shifts; the woman on the arm
of the man he is investigating, apparently an escape artist,
appears to be more than what she seems on the surface level.
He stalks her relentlessly, observing her various transformations
and aliases, all while witnessing massive carnage as the
men who flirt with her suddenly wind up in body bags (to
keep his mind occupied in between victims, the visage of
his long-dead young daughter haunts his every move). Naturally,
no one in the audience knows why the hero would watch over
a psycho such as this (at least at first). But the halted
approach is a little necessary for the lurid subject matter;
any script that tries to describe how a man can be infatuated
with a woman who kills all of her lovers is obviously ill-fated.
The
"Eye," our supposed hero, is played by Ewan McGregor--an
admirable man who flaunted dramatic strength in "Star Wars
Episode 1: The Phantom Menace," but holds everything back
here. Ashley Judd, likewise, proves to be quite a frustrating
screen presence with her portrayal as Joanna Eris, the master
of disguise. And singer/songwriter k.d. Lang is even in
the movie, cast as a fellow investigator who helps the "Eye"
with all of his troubles, although the screenplay gives
her nothing to do but to sit behind a computer screen.
One
of the most infuriating qualities about the script is its
lack of logic and use of sudden coincidences. How is it
possible, for example, for a car to wind up submerged in
a frozen pond a good few yards away from the road when it
actually swerves off right beside the path? Incidentally,
how does one bug an entire apartment with surveillance cameras
in plain view, and the one being watched never notices?
Furthermore, how can Joanna Eris not immediately recognize
the "Eye" after a discussion in a diner, when in fact she
has met up with him a few other times (including one incident
in which she realized he was stalking her, and turned the
tables for fun)? Some of this substance is so bloated and
incompetent that it surely leave many staring at the screen
in utter disbelief.
All
while this is going on, the script (without warning) unleashes
a big mystery on the viewer, eventually connecting the two
characters in such a way that only cheapens their link.
Of course, the real mystery would be how any human being
could find this unexpected development jolting, especially
compared to the surprise twist of "The Sixth Sense" (which
is, even in itself, an overrated film). In truth, the only
mildly startling moment in "Eye Of The Beholder" is when
the "Eye" fires a gun at a cop car from a distance (and
the scene barely lasts 15 seconds). Things get even more
wretched as the running time pushes 100 minutes, and eventually
to its inconclusive climax. On the way out of the theater,
someone ahead actually muttered words of guilt--"what a
waste of fifteen bucks!" He should be happy; Destination
films actually spent millions to have this thing made.
What
was the point of this mess, and why was it not given a more
intelligent approach? The premise, be it absurd, can essentially
inspire something in the style of a great Hitchcock film;
sadly, every possibility with "Eye Of The Beholder" is thrown
away by incoherent directing, pretentious plot twists and
an uncertain atmosphere. In a year already opened by sci-fi
trash ("Supernova") and laughless comedies ("Next Friday"),
"Eye Of The Beholder" extends the already-realized notion
that, perhaps, the apocalypse would be less painful than
seeing many of the latest cinema arrivals.
©
2000,
David Keyes, Cinemaphile.org.
Please e-mail the author here
if the above review contains any spelling or grammar mistakes. |