Rating
-
Horror
(US); 2000; Rated R; 90 Minutes
Cast
Kim Director
Jeffrey Donovan
Erica Leerhsen
Tristine Skyler
Stephen Turner
Produced by Bill Carraro, Daniel Myrick and Eduardo
Sanchez; Directed by Joe Berlinger; Screenwritten
by Joe Berlinger and Dick Beebe
Review Uploaded
11/03/00 |
Written
by DAVID KEYES The
phenomenon that is “The Blair Witch Project” may have scared
the pants of countless viewers when it hit theaters last
year, but few people realize that it also opened up a floodgate
on the grounds of the film’s base setting—a small community
in Maryland that the filmmakers had designated “Burkittsville”—where
avid fans of the movie flock in droves year-round to, optimistically,
catch a glimpse of something that gave the innovative horror
flick its profound atmosphere. Now comes “Book Of Shadows:
Blair Witch 2,” which makes a descent into the lives of
five such individuals who were spurred by the popularity
of the first film, and are now on a journey through the
fictitious Burkittsville woods to see all the famous locations
where the mockumentary was initially shot (all while the
masses argue over the authenticity of the legend, too).
Their trek is built on the same innocence and naivety that
the three student filmmakers took with them when they went
in search of the Blair Witch, but now with different results.
In the first movie, our protagonists disappeared without
a trace; this time around, the fate of curious eyes is more
visible, but perhaps more tormenting as well.
It
would be easy to denounce “Book Of Shadows” as merely an
excuse to make a further investment off the popularity of
the Blair Witch, but that would be an unfair conclusion
for two reasons: (1) cashing in on the public’s demand for
more would have likely lead to a sequel of directly similar
substance, which this movie demonstrates little of; and
(2) all new ideas at least deserve an opportunity to be
tinkered with by other filmmakers in the industry. Such
notions are the impelling influence behind this highly-anticipated
follow-up to last year’s sleeper hit, and though this isn’t
a movie with enough redeemable features to be leveled with
the original, it is, at least, still a mildly engaging horror
flick with enough tension and energy to work up the audience.
Keeping
with tradition, the movie uses unfamiliar actors, all playing
characters with their real life names, as the victims of
a supernatural gesture. At the opening of the movie, interviews
are conducted with residents of the now-commercial Maryland
town Burkittsville, who are both amazed and annoyed by the
buzz in their community generated by the admirers of “The
Blair Witch Project” (an older woman in the interview sessions,
though, reveals that she has made a killing by selling artifacts
right from her back yard to tourists passing through town).
One resident to capitalize off the success of the movie
is local boy Jeffrey Donovan, who runs an expedition called
“The Blair Witch Hunt” for gullible excursionists who need
a tour guide to take them through the woods and investigate
the locations shown in the first picture. Donovan is actually
a former mental patient, as displayed by staggered flashbacks,
and that adds a sense of foreshadowing to the situation:
four people who he has recruited for this journey enter
the woods with high hopes and ambitions, but by the time
they leave, have fallen victim to strange visions, body
marks that appear without warning, and supernatural manifestations
that cripple their confidence and add to the panic of an
already-questionable experience.
The
characterizations offer some intriguing diversity, too:
Stephen and Tristine, a couple who are writing a book on
the mass hysteria created by the Blair Witch phenomenon;
Kim, a woman who dresses in all black and is tired of all
the negative stereotypes generated by her appearance; and
Erica, a modern Wiccan who believes the first movie’s stance
on witchcraft has set her religion back 300 years (Wicca,
as it should be noted, is an earth-based religion that the
masses unfairly associate with evil practices). The movie
juggles these personalities with a sense of clarity and
distinction for a brief while, developing them into the
independent specimens needed for any solid horror movie.
It is a task, alas, that strays off direction once the visuals
kick into overdrive: the film then can’t seem to decide
who the real main character is, and we find it increasingly
difficult to sympathize with any of them as single entities.
The
events that the five encounter are almost just as muddled.
After spending a night in the woods, most of which they
have blacked out, our five energetic travelers begin having
all sorts of premonitions depicting unrelated variations
of torture and death, sometimes flashing them on screen
so fast that we can’t tell what they are without a repeat
viewing. It is the immediate assumption that something supernatural
has descended on the lives of these individuals (after all,
they are dealing with places where a witch may have actually
existed), but none of them ever seem to realize it, even
when one character has dreams through the eyes of the entity
herself. Those realizations don’t actually surface until
the climax of the movie, which, despite being inconclusive
of evidence that the Blair Witch actually exists, is very
unexpected and satisfying.
Why
is the movie titled “Book Of Shadows,” though? The only
link I can establish goes back to Erica, the Wiccan, whose
religion uses this term for the journal which her people
use to keep track of spells they have cast (or something
to that effect). There is no direct reference, however,
leading the viewer to wonder: what exactly are the filmmakers
trying to say with this attribution? There is a lot more
to dislike about “BW2”—the visual gimmicks seem a little
fragmented, for example, and undermine the plot—but few
of the quibbles will interfere with the big factors here:
the movie is well shot, has a solid pace, is energetic,
and establishes an effective atmosphere. The movie works,
if not as a sequel to a much greater endeavor, then as a
vehicle of mild thrills for audiences in the mood for something
to satisfy their thirst for Halloween horrors. Just don’t
expect to see a masterpiece, though.
©
2000,
David Keyes, Cinemaphile.org.
Please e-mail the author here
if the above review contains any spelling or grammar mistakes. |