Rating
-
Thriller/Comedy
(US); 2000; Rated R; 97 Minutes
Cast
Christian Bale: Patrick Bateman
Reese Witherspoon: Evelyn
Chloe Sevigny: Jean
Jared Leto: Paul Allen
Willem Dafoe: Donald Kimball
Samantha Mathis: Courtney
Produced by Ernie Barbarash, Joseph Drake, Christian
Halsey Solomon, Chris Hanley, Victoria Hirst, Michael Paseornek,
Edward R. Pressman, Ron Rotholz, Jeff Sackman and Clifford
Streit; Directed by Mary Harron; Screenwritten
by Mary Harron and Guinevere Turner; based on the novel
by Bret Easton Ellis
Review Uploaded
4/16/00 |
Written
by DAVID KEYES At
surface level, Patrick Bateman seems like the kind of guy
that every young man would love to be modeled after: he
has a successful job, lives in an upstate apartment, is
showered in riches and has friends in high places. This
is what one could call a “role model,” an ideal archetype
for youngsters who seek to achieve success on various avenues.
But anyone who has even heard of “American Psycho,” either
as a film or as a controversial novel by Bret Easton Ellis,
surely knows that this image of fortune and vitality is
completely deceiving. Beneath this deluding appearance lies
a madman beyond description: a sadistic and superficial
being that feeds on sex, drugs and violence in order to
fill a void in his soul.
There
have been countless pictures depicting these kinds of stories:
“In The Company Of Men,” “Fight Club,” and the recent “Boiling
Room” are all prime examples, as they paint portraits of
men who will push any boundaries in order to get what they
want. “American Psycho,” directed by Mary Harron, penetrates
the very heart of this theme; it is a scathing, bitter,
savage and cold film without much uplifting energy or spirit
(other than a few brief moments of witty satire). And yet
the movie is one of the greatest of its kind, well-shot
and tightly devised by a talented group of filmmakers. The
script, written by Harron and Guinevere Turner, sees its
character neither as villain nor hero, but as a prototype
unnerved by a position of authority. I say “prototype” because
the character himself is not really human; he’s a reflection
of the searing shallowness of society’s bigwigs, who chew
up and spit out anyone they can in exchange for wealth and
power. But Bateman, unlike most, embraces the sadism of
his disposition; at one point he announces, “There is no
real me. I am simply not there.” He lacks a conscience,
yes, but doesn’t fool himself into believing that he actually
has one.
The
material is adapted from what is considered one of the most
daring books ever made. In the story, Bateman (Christian
Bale) is a guy whom everyone at the office respects—funny,
smart, sophisticated and dedicated to his work. At night,
however, he leads a different life: one in which morals
are nonexistent and brutal mayhem is conducted. In one of
the earlier scenes, we see Patrick casually pass a woman
on the street and greet her with kind regards; in the next
scene, he is at the Laundromat with blood-soaked sheets
in his hands.
What
is most disturbing, but perhaps unsurprising, is that Patrick
enjoys murdering these people; the look on his face as he
slaughters a co-worker with an axe, for instance, is almost
pure pleasure. But those that work in his office are unaware
(and sometimes uncaring) of his nightly tendencies. When
a woman at a local nightclub asks him what he is “in to,”
he replies with subtle honesty, “murders and executions.”
A colleague sitting right next to him at the time seems
un-alarmed, however, assuming that Patrick said “mergers
and acquisitions.”
As
the director, Mary Harron does a remarkable job with the
material, taking the Bateman character to unsettling heights
without ever lauding the details of his mental rampage (as
certain directors might have done). But best of all, she
does not achieve all these shudders by using extensive blood
and gore on screen; some of it is shown, yes, but most of
it is simply suggested. Why did the film almost get an “NC-17”
rating, then? Because the sexual content is rather extensive;
in one scene, Bateman engages in a threesome with two women
while admiring his muscles in the mirror (the scene, by
the way, was actually edited down to initially achieve the
R rating). Yes, the sex is graphic, but why does the MPAA
insist on slapping pornographic material with its “Kiss
of Death” instead of something more damaging to younger
viewers, like gratuitous violence? Some things may never
be explained.
Christian
Bale acts out Bateman with the same prominence as the novel,
using cynicism in comments towards coworkers and commoners,
but maintaining a sense of enthusiasm for the violent acts
he performs by night. As an actor, he also does a fine job
in parading the egocentricity of his character, particularly
when we see Bateman use over a dozen different cleansers
in the shower and wear an ice pack over his eyes to reduce
puffiness. Choosing someone to fill this role was undoubtedly
difficult (at one point, even Leonardo DiCaprio was rumored
to play Bateman), but Bale is the ideal choice because he
understands the complexity of the personality and illustrates
it effectively. The performance is worthy of an Oscar nod.
There
are debates among many movie buffs, however, that question
the authenticity of the murder scenes: are they really happening,
or are they merely fantasies in Bateman’s mind? Many of
the death scenes are realistic, but one particular scenario
sticks in the mind as support of the latter conclusion,
when Patrick chases a screaming prostitute down a hotel
hallway with a chainsaw in his hands. There are no signs
of concern from hotel residents, who can obviously hear
the motor of the chainsaw—no open doors and no calls to
the police. Could someone ever get away with this in real
life? Hardly. And is it possible that Bateman could aim
a chainsaw well enough so that it would slice his victim
when he threw it downstairs towards her? Doubtful.
Whether
or not the murders actually happen is beside the point:
the film is an incisive commentary about the emptiness and
rapacity of important people, and how their emotional detachment
can drive them to do, or even think of doing, despicable
deeds. Like a slew of recent pictures, the movie also features
a surprise ending that, like some of the murder scenes,
is almost hallucinatory; but unlike those films, the journey
towards the climax is neither slow nor dreary; it is filled
with great tension and intrigue. As a result of this quality,
in addition to fine performances and clever writing, “American
Psycho” is so far the best film of 2000.
©
2000, David Keyes, Cinemaphile.org.
Please e-mail the author here
if the above review contains any spelling or grammar mistakes. |