Rating
-
Drama/Comedy
(US); 1999; Rated PG; 132 Minutes
Cast
Robin Williams: Andrew
Sam Neill: Richard "Sir" Martin
Wendy Crewson: Ma'am
Embeth Davidtz: Little Miss/Portia
Oliver Platt: Rupert Burns
Hallie Kate Eisenberg: Little Miss, 7 years old
Stephen Root: Dennis Mansky
Produced by Michael
Barnathan, Chris Columbus, Paula DuPré Pesman, Gail Katz,
Dan Kolsrud, Laurence Mark, Neal Miller, Wolfgang Petersen
and Mark Radcliffe; Directed by Chris Columbus; Screenwritten
by Nicholas Kazan; based on the story "The Bicenennial
Man" by Isaac Asimov
Review Uploaded
12/24/99 |
Written
by DAVID KEYES Generally
speaking, the movie career of Robin Williams can be arranged
into three principal categories. The first is comedy, and
it plays out as his most successful forte; impressions,
in-jokes and character roles are part of this delightful
passion, and has helped given us such memorable pictures
as "Aladdin," "Good Morning Vietnam" and "The Fisher King."
The second category is drama, and, although not as prominent
as humor, is responsible for some equally-effective pictures,
among them "Awakenings," "Good Will Hunting" and "What Dreams
May Come." That third category, however, is a discrediting
influence on the first two: trashy maudlin melodrama. Mr.
Williams has a tendency to combine both his wit and dramatic
success in the same performances, but he generates little
ambition, and allows the script to manipulate him just as
much as it manipulates the audience. Such results have proven
destructive, as seen in the painful works of "Dead Poets
Society," "Patch Adams," and most recently, "Jakob The Liar."
"Bicentennial
Man" falls into that ever-pathetic third category, because
it is neither heart wrenching, moving, or lovable, despite
what many a moviegoer may think; instead of realistic emotion,
or even creditable direction, the movie sweeps up hordes
sentimental dirt and presents it in the form of a machine
who may, or may not, actually be human on the inside. And
because of the decrepit treatment director Chris Columbus
and his stars provide, this is movie is far from being even
mildly bad, as most melodramas tend to be. "Bicentennial
Man" is nothing but a sappy, shameless, and morbid production
that wastes talent and time in a script designed to line
the bottom of a bird cage.
The
story tosses out sour grapes at an ineffable rate. In the
near future, the NDR-114 android has become one of the most
popular utilities of its time (sort of like a grown-up version
of the Pokémon craze). As the craze expands to virtually
every household in the suburbs, the story begins focusing
in on one particular appliance named Andrew (so named by
a little girl who could not pronounce "android"), who has
just been delivered to the door of Richard Martin (Sam Neill).
Andrew is, predictably, not your average android; his home
consists of four individuals, some of whom feel uncomfortable
with his presence, others who adore his schmaltzy attitude
(as if androids could ever feel emotion). Of course, none
of the sentiment starts kicking in until later, when each
family member has expressed their most hated (or loved)
feelings towards the robot. Sam Neil, whom Andrew calls
"Sir," defends the robot to his concerned family, and soon
after, we get a machine who can tell jokes, laugh, care,
and become concerned about the family he has been sold to.
As
a machine, Mr. Williams provides us with the most lackluster
performance of his career--his shifts between drama and
comedy wear thin and are obvious, and the cheap sentiment
provoked by the shenanigans of the plot doesn't help much,
either. Much more disruptive than his performance, however,
is the director's ghastly treatment, which shifts tones
faster than a bullet, and takes too much time in deciding
which of these tones is more effective. The tagline, which
states that it takes 200 years for a robot to become an
ordinary man, is much-deserved; we feel like we've aged
two centuries just watching it.
Like
a deck of cards, director Chris Columbus enjoys playing
with his hand full of emotional experiences intended to
stimulate a viewer's soft side. This time, it appears he
has been playing with the wrong deck. He, as most know,
directed "Stepmom" last year, and although the movie was
not a very effective melodrama, it managed to retain some
respectable performances. This movie doesn't even have plausibly
bad performances; the actors revert to the type of cheap
emotion that made "Patch Adams" so nauseating, and the kind
that made "Dead Poets Society" a cringe-fest. And like those
films, the only way one will feel warm and fuzzy at "Bicentennial
Man" is if they wear a sweater.
©
1999, David Keyes, Cinemaphile.org.
Please e-mail the author here
if the above review contains any spelling or grammar mistakes. |