Rating
-
Comedy (US);
1999; Rated PG; 94 Minutes
Cast
Kathleen Turner: Elena Kinder
Christopher Lloyd: Heep
Kim Cattral: Robin
Peter MacNicol: Dan
Dom DeLuise: Lenny
Ruby Dee: Margo
Kyle Howard: Dickie
Produced by Steven
Paul and David Sanders; Directed by Bob Clark; Screenwritten
by Steven Paul, Fransisca Matos, Robert Grasmere, Bob
Clark and Greg Michael
Review Uploaded
4/02/99 |
Written
by DAVID KEYES The
children in "Baby Geniuses" occupy the movie like failed
robotic experiments. It's so obvious that special effects
are controlling the movements of their mouths that the entire
process was probably designed by someone with the mind capacity
of a dairy product. Infants speak with manipulated oral
movements that, for some lame-brained reason, don't even
run in synch with the actual dialogue. For awhile, I wondered
if it was possible that the moviemakers ran the dialogue
tape a little further ahead of the actual movie speed, but
if they're stupid enough to even consider making a movie
like this, the reasons could be various. The picture is
designed to appeal to those under an age of six, most likely,
but if I were around that age, the last thing I'd want to
do is see "Baby Geniuses" at my own free will. Here is a
movie so bad, so incredibly lurid, that it doesn't deserved
to be described with words containing more than one syllable,
for fear that the filmmakers might read this review and
get confused.
Everything
about it is completely unforgivable; it is an abhorrence
to the mind, the heart, the eyes, and to the desire of manipulating
the nature of humanity. It's stupid, unfunny, piteous, sloppy,
and designed to appeal to an audience that doesn't even
exist. There are points when the maniacal script takes so
many ridiculous and crummy turns that it wallows in self-pity
and expects us not to care. It has the notion that, even
if babies cannot be this smart in reality, we will always
be the stupid ones. Even though time has proven that no
infant has the intelligence of the average human in adulthood,
one thing is definitely undeniable here: the people who
made "Baby Geniuses" have the IQ of Gerber food.
The
movie drones endlessly on the foundations of three entirely
obvious setups. At first, you have the typical "Look Who's
Talking"/"Babe" formula, in which the morphing of human
mouths create the illusion that babies are talking, and
talking with tremendous intelligence. Their manipulated
oral language translates from the standard baby talk into
a highly useful dialect that, as a baby psychiatrist discovers
through a process she calls "Kinder Method," could help
her and her assistant become 'powerful and wealthy.' The
kid she has under close observation is Sly, a young little
tike who in truth is separated from his twin, Whit, while
Dr. Kinder (Kathleen Turner) observes his language skills
under CGI experiments. Meanwhile, Kinder's niece, Robin
(Kim Cattral) raises Whit with the warmth and love of a
mother.
But
Sly knows what the diabolical Kinder is up to. He escapes
the lab and winds up in a mall, in which the filmmakers
rip-off the "Parent Trap" formula and allow Sly to meet
up with his brother, Whit, while he and his parents are
shopping. Painfully exercising the defects of human nature,
the movie continues on when Whit and Sly decide to trade
places and put an end to Kinder's viscous plans.
Then
comes the agonizingly boring "Home Alone" cartoon violence;
babies trip adults, babies smash objects into adults body
parts, and so on. All of it is filmed without reason or
passion, and sometimes gets so annoying, watching a series
of outtakes from "Cannonball Run" might have been more amusing.
In John Hughes' "Home Alone," the bones crunching and screams
of pain offered tremendous comic relief for a movie that
was pretty much deadweight. Ahh, but if a movie is dead,
that usually means it had to be alive at one time or another.
"Baby Geniuses" was undoubtedly a dead-zone from the first
moment it entertained the thoughts of filmmakers, and thus,
by the time the "Home Alone" physical humor arrives, it
inflicts such tremendous affliction that you'd rather have
diaper rash.
The
whole idea is fiddle-faddle. Babies are made out to be incredibly
wise individuals who know practically everything while in
infancy, and once they reach age two, they just cross over
to normal humanity and never remember what they were able
to do during their first years of life. If any human audience
is expected to believe that, than the creators undoubtedly
think that half of the movie audience has lost all prospect
to be entertained.
This
is absolute cinematic torture; a maniacal insult to the
foundation that humanity is made upon, and to the gods who
created it all those millenniums ago. To say that I detested
every loathsome second of it would be an understatement.
©
1999, David Keyes, Cinemaphile.org.
Please e-mail the author here
if the above review contains any spelling or grammar mistakes. |