Rating
-
Comedy (US);
1999; Rated PG-13; 102 Minutes
Cast
Rupert Everett: Oberon
Michele Pfeiffer: Titania
Stanley Tucci: Robin Goodfellow, or 'Puck'
Calista Flockhart: Helena
Dominic West: Lysander
Anna Friel: Hermia
Christian Bale: Demetrius
Kevin Kline: Nick Bottom
Produced by Michael
Hoffman, Arnon Milchan, Leslie Urdang and Ann Wingate; Directed
and screenwritten by Michael Hoffman; based on the
play "A Midsummer Night's Dream" by William Shakespeare
Review Uploaded
6/02/99 |
Written
by DAVID KEYES "If
we shadows have offended,
Think but this and all is mended,
That you have but slumbered here,
When these visions did appear."
-Verse
from Puck's Act V speech of "A Midsummer Night's Dream"
William
Shakespeare's "A Midsummer Night's Dream" has always been
one of the poet's most outrageous plays, but Michael Hoffman,
the director of this modern film adaptation, turns it into
something that. not even the bard could. Will's story was
fun and enchanting, yes, but far from perfect. Hoffman shows
us that he is capable of being more than just a man behind
the camera, because he brings to the foreground of the story
beauty and elegance. He has turned this timeless story into
a masterpiece.
I'm
not being indulgent when I praise his approach to the material.
There have been numerous occasions when Shakespeare's plays
fall short of becoming what we so desperately want them
to be, and there have been other occasions when filmmakers
cut loose a little and turn those plays into great movies.
There is, for instance, Franco Zeffirelli's version of "The
Taming Of The Shrew." The story is essentially overrated,
and yet it became one of the best films ever made. It's
greatness was achieved by the indirect approach Zeffirelli
made on the material. Without changing much of the plot,
he gave the play a unique look, with a cast that remains
one of the greatest ensembles in cinema history.
Such
a treatment for Shakespeare has been passed down through
time, in which filmmakers have used his plays as a backdrop
for their own cinematic ambition. Here, Hoffman gives us
the characters that seem nostalgic to us after reading,
or seeing, the play, and adds an extra layer onto them with
beautiful costumes, elegant scenarios and a standout cast.
They are the sweet ingredients of a magical recipe, and
what holds it all together is the familiar, fun story, which
tells the tale of four lovers who become the experiments
of mistaken identity, magic potions, fairies, and several
other silly things.
Egeus,
father to Hermia, has betrothed his daughter to Demetrius,
a man who in turn loves her with all his heart, and is determined
not to let Hermia's true love, Lysander, from inheriting
his bride. Then Hermia and Lysander plot to run away together
to avoid this marriage, and even possible death. They share
their plot with Helena, a close friend, who unfolds on-stage
her own attraction to Demetrius. She then storms out to
inform him of what Hermia and Lysander are doing, which
will benefit Helena later, as she suspects that her decision
to reveal this plan to Demetrius will show him how much
she loves him.
Then,
of course, we meet the fairies. Oberon (Rupert Everett)
and Titania (Michele Pfeiffer) are king and queen of this
charming race, but that does not prevent them from feuding
over an Indian boy Titania cares for. Returning home and
falling asleep, Oberon discusses a plot with his servant,
Robin Goodfellow (or 'Puck'), to apply a nectar from a forest
flower to his queen's eyes so that, when she awakes, she
shall fall in love with the first ugly creature that catches
her eye. Continuing with this plan, the king hears the accounts
of the four lovers as they become separated from each other
in the forest. He furthers his orders to Puck, who is instructed
to apply this nectar to Demetrius, so that he can fall in
love with Helena, and all will be solved. But the plan is
distracted when Puck gets the men confused, and applies
the nectar to Lysander's eyes. He then exits the scene ("Awake
when I am gone, for I must now to Oberon"), and Lysander,
as you probably know, falls in love with Helena at first
sight. All of these mixed-up love potions create a chemistry
between the four lovers that is one of the best I've seen
on screen. After Puck's mistakes have been corrected, and
the right lovers fall in love with the people they are supposed
to, the movie then moves on to that notoriously hilarious
act when several local tradesmen put on a performance of
the play "Pyramus and Thisbe" for their duke and the lovers.
As we can imagine, the performance is ridiculous and clumsy,
allowing the audience to mock the production. The performance
leads up to a marvelous conclusion, of which Puck gives
us his wonderful speech, asking the audience to think of
the whole movie "as merely a dream."
In
the actual story, Puck (or Robin Goodfellow, more appropriately)
plays the most important role, because he is the carrier
of this flower nectar which transforms all the 'love cycles'
of the four lovers. Even more importantly, his antics through
the fairy forest kept us entertained even through some of
the most dull parts. Here, Stanley Tucci does his best to
bring the character to screen life. But the movie, unlike
the play, really belongs to Nick Bottom, the weaver, who
is played so well by Kevin Kline, that it was as if he was
made for the role. Bottom, as you might recall, went deep
into the forest with his pals to practice their production
of "Pyramus and Thisbe," the play they planned to put on
for Theseus, the duke, and his new bride, Hippolyta. He
exited, and then on cue, entered the scene with long ears,
whiskers and buck teeth. The fairy king and Puck had given
him the head of an ass, which later was revealed as part
of a plan against Oberon's wife, Titania. Upon hearing his
voice, she awakens and, under the spell of the flower, falls
in love with the 'donkey man.' In these scenes, Kevin Kline
enriches the screen with his presence as a gentle weaver,
and then is followed by great passion of Michelle Pfeiffer's
performance. These two, may it be in the near future, deserve
Academy Awards.
If
the story and dialogue help capture the enchanting flavor,
so does the setting. Hoffman takes the story into a new
but appropriate scenario--19th century Tuscany, to be precise--which
looks odd for a Shakespearean work, but is effectively staged.
Unlike most directors, who underscore Shakespeare's language
and story in front of 'over-modern' scenarios ("Romeo +
Juliet" is the #1 example), he is careful to balance things
out; the modernizations aren't too modern, and his changes
to the original story are minor and almost unnoticeable.
A really good movie maker takes a classic story and, if
changes are necessary, modifies it in a way that will best
please a movie-goeing audience. Those who do not like the
written work of William Shakespeare might enjoy the movie
because it tells us the story using visuals, sets, and design
that you could not possible imagine when written down on
paper.
Towards
the closing of the movie, I was reminded of how these plays
are more than just words scribbled on paper and acted by
people reading off of it. Shakespeare is a transcending
phenomenon, shaping the way people think about poetry and
literature, and inspiring the movie makers who enjoy revisiting
timeless tales for the benefit of finding a movie-goeing
audience. If the cinema is divided by literature and art,
then "A Midsummer Night's Dream" is the dividing line between
those two virtues.
Of
all contemporary Shakespeare movies, this one rises above
the entire crowd. One might even say that it is better than
"Twelfth Night," Kenneth Brannagh's three movies ("Henry
V," "Hamlet" and "Much Ado About Nothing,"), Richard Loncrane's
"Richard III," and even Oliver Parker's "Othello." Heck,
I like it even more than John Madden's charming comedy "Shakespeare
In Love," which recently won the Best Picture Oscar for
taking us to the root of all of Shakespeare's words and
inspirations. Is that saying much? I'd like to think so.
Most of the movies listed above are terrific films, if not
masterworks.
But
perhaps this one is more special because it does not depend
as much on the contemporary atmosphere as it does with the
classic story. "A Midsummer Night's Dream" is not so much
a movie as it is a wonderful dream. The movie adds delicate
beauty to what we already consider a rollicking Shakespearean
comedy.
©
1999, David Keyes, Cinemaphile.org.
Please e-mail the author here
if the above review contains any spelling or grammar mistakes. |